Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > High Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #29  
Old 03-07-2007, 05:55 PM
sawseech sawseech is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 548
Default Re: Proposed book profiling big online winners

Interest takes the form of late-payment penalties, and those penalties are abusive (imagine a really bad credit card, and then double it).

Quarterly payments require two years of history to make a reasonable calculation, and if you are climbing stakes, it further cripples your earning potential and so constitutes an opportunity cost. Imagine setting aside half your winnings every 3 months, and also having to live. It's a joke, and is usually reserved for deliquent filers with history.

The present taxcode treats OPPs as it does contract workers or real estate representatives; it assumes that a poker player can operate without loss for extended periods, and that winnings which put the player in the black are as windfall - hence, no carryover of losses. This is flawed.

However, the fed cannot rewrite the code to resemble present capital gains law (the most reasonable approach) as it would generate masses of work and paper at a net loss to the taxpayer. Imagine everyone in vegas having to get a receipt for their net position at the end of every session, for every game. Imagine the IRS having to sort through it all. Imagine the complaints and the backlog in the courts.

Gambling would no longer be fun and people would go underground for their fix.
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.