Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Politics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old 01-23-2007, 12:01 PM
schroedy schroedy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 537
Default From HRC to Libertarian - One Poker Player\'s Path

My response to Mrs. Clinton's initial request for (more) financial support:



_____________________ __________________ __________________

I have long been a "positional" and "financial" supporter of Mrs. Clinton's. I recall my (then) 8 year old daughter who was studying the Presidents in school asking me with earnest curiosity, why out of all 42 Presidents, not one had been a woman. Jokingly, I pointed out that you COULD get 42 straight tails by flipping a coin. A short discussion of the women's suffrage and more general liberation movement followed. To which she replied, "Oh Dad. You're talking about the stone ages." Thus, Mrs. Clinton's candidacy has symbolic as well as political positional impact for me. I would love to be a vigorous supporter. (My daughter is 22 today.)

However, in light of recent activity of the Department of Justice in the oppression of online gaming, generally, and in particular as it affects online poker, I will not be supporting any candidate for any office unless they overtly come out in support of legalization and regulation of online gaming, or at least poker. I understand that the Libertarian party has had discussions with World Series of Poker main event champion Greg Raymer about the Vice Presidential slot on their ticket. Because I am certain that Mr. Raymer's views on online poker correspond to my own, I will be supporting the Libertarian ticket, unless and until a democratic candidate comes out overtly in favor of the legalization and regulation of online poker. This issue may seem trivial to you, but it clearly represents BY FAR the issue in which the policy and activity of the federal government mosts affects my day to day life and livelihood.

Everyone that knows me knows that my vote was (and my contributions were) HRC's to lose (in fact many were quite sick of hearing me extol her virtues). However, I cannot continue to support her unless she overtly opposes the recent activity of the DOJ with respect to online gaming (or at least poker).
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.