![]() |
|
#29
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] In a few sentences you pretty much added nothing. [/ QUOTE ] That seems harsh. Did you read the link I posted? [/ QUOTE ] I did go to the link and I couldn't figure out what exactly your point was, and therefore I didn't find it helpful for this discussion. Your Cliff Notes version is excellent and helps the discussion along. I do not disagree with the idea that small leaks are important to plug. And if you can plug these leaks your winrate will go up by definition. The argument on which leaks to plug first is interesting though. I offer no proof that large leaks are _more_ important to plug first than small leaks. What I do believe fairly strongly though is that the analysis I suggest will minimize the effect of normal* distribution of big poker pots and help you determine exactly what your current winrate is. At 10,000 hands standard statistical analysis leave you with not very accurate information. |
|
|