Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Politics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #29  
Old 12-10-2006, 10:53 PM
Copernicus Copernicus is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 6,912
Default Re: A sub-point

[ QUOTE ]

Then why has CEO pay continued to sky rocket? <font color="red">couldnt have any relationship to record profits, could it? </font>
Why haven't these managers voted against the nearly $1 billion dollar pay packages? <font color="red">pay packges are established by boards, not by mutual fund managers. Directors have fiduciary liability for their actions, including pay packages See the Disney case </font>
Why not esp when CEO pay has time and time again been show to be unrealated to stock performance? <font color="red">Pay packages linked to stock performance (most notably options)have led to larger pay packages , not smaller </font>
Why do CEOs leave their jobs so often? <font color="red"> what is "often"? The circumstances of CEO job change are no different than any other corporate position.</font>

You're claiming this problematic rule isn't actually problematic, despite the problematic results of it.

[/ QUOTE ]

The results are problematic in your view, not necessarily the view of stakeholders in the companies. When they are problematic there are remedies.
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.