Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > Poker Theory
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old 10-10-2006, 07:25 PM
P0k3rNooB P0k3rNooB is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 16
Default You can\'t win tournaments without winning races

I've heard the expression, "You can't win tournaments without winning races" many times. And with limited experience I can see how this could be true. Wouldn't that mean then, that winning tournaments is a game of luck, not a game of skill. If you can't win without being lucky, then superior play has no bearing?

Just want some thoughts of this. I personnally, rarely win races. TT vs AK. if i'm ak the ten's hold, if I'm TT, they get beat.

Not bitter, i'm just not a lucky person, but i feel as though i'm a good player. When I get someone all-in with their A8 vs my AK and the 8 gives them one pair to beat me, what am i doing wrong?

Is there any value in avoiding races altogether? Is it impossible to win if you always fold away your races?

Thanks for the ideas/theories.
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.