Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Limit
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #20  
Old 08-16-2006, 04:33 PM
bozlax bozlax is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Wookie is right
Posts: 8,848
Default Re: Bryce\'s Pre-Flop Bible

Not that it's actually germane to Bryce's point (see below), but some interesting fuel to add to the A4o v. QJo fire: I ran PokerStove for both against a top-20% range and a random hand. I know it's not really a good measure of preflop equity yada yada, but it does give a good indication of relative hand strength. The results:

Text results appended to pokerstove.txt

25,170,868,800 games 29.453 secs 854,611,374 games/sec

Board:
Dead:

equity (%) win (%) tie (%)
Hand 1: 56.7297 % 54.73% 02.00% { A4o }
Hand 2: 43.2703 % 41.27% 02.00% { random }


---

25,170,868,800 games 31.875 secs 789,674,315 games/sec

Board:
Dead:

equity (%) win (%) tie (%)
Hand 1: 58.1347 % 56.91% 01.23% { QJo }
Hand 2: 41.8653 % 40.64% 01.23% { random }


---

4,746,506,688 games 6.141 secs 772,920,808 games/sec

Board:
Dead:

equity (%) win (%) tie (%)
Hand 1: 41.0460 % 38.43% 02.61% { QJo }
Hand 2: 58.9540 % 56.34% 02.61% { 66+, A4s+, K8s+, Q9s+, J9s+, T9s, A9o+, KTo+, QTo+, JTo }


---

4,951,983,168 games 6.141 secs 806,380,584 games/sec

Board:
Dead:

equity (%) win (%) tie (%)
Hand 1: 42.1960 % 39.78% 02.42% { A4o }
Hand 2: 57.8040 % 55.39% 02.42% { 66+, A4s+, K8s+, Q9s+, J9s+, T9s, A9o+, KTo+, QTo+, JTo }


---

Well, I'll be dipped in [censored]. QJo is better than A4o against a random hand. A4o is better against a top-20% hand. The difference between the two in either situation is negligible. Neither is good enough against the tighter stealing range that you should be playing it HU, much less 3-betting it, but clearly if you're going to 3-bet one you should also 3-bet the other.

fwiw, I just went back and re-read Bryce's original post. There're way too many words which clouds the funamental message (which I completely agree with, and actually said in here somewhere) that, "when stealing/defending, it's important to have a read on your opponent." I also think he chose to illustrate his point with some very poor examples for the limits this forum discusses. However, I appreciate the effort he clearly put into it.
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:51 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.