![]() |
|
View Poll Results: Would you rather have sex with a virgin, or a pornstar? | |||
Virgin |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
197 | 46.14% |
Pornstar |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
230 | 53.86% |
Voters: 427. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [quote Peyton Manning has been a loser in both college and the pros. [/ QUOTE ] 40-9 as a sarter in college, including 3-1 in Bowl games. The only time you could ever call him a loser when regarding his college career is if Florida is in the conversation. [/ QUOTE ]How many national titles? How did his college do the year after he left? [/ QUOTE ] Again, they would've been in the running for at least one, possibly two National Titles if not for their inability to beat Florida. Edit - And before you pin those FLA. losses on Manning, Phil Fulmer has always had an extremly tough time competing with the Gators. [/ QUOTE ]So, in other words, if he could've won the big game against his arch rivals, then they might have won it all. Boy, that sounds familiar. But wait, it must have been the team and not Manning, right? Nope- the very next year after Manning left, Tennessee beat Florida and went on to win the national title. [/ QUOTE ] So he's a loser because he couldn't defeat a team that finished in the top 5 three years in a row during his tenure, including a National Championship in 1996? Even when he had a coach who self-admits that he cannot beat the team? Also, his numbers against Florida: 1994: 3-5, 27 yards. 1995: 23-36 326 yards 2 TD's 0 Ints. 1996: 37-65 492 yards 4 td's 4 int's. 1997: 29-51 353 yards 2 TD's 1 INT. Not all that bad of numbers. In addition, Tennessee finished 2nd in the National Polls following the 1995 season. Second to arguably the greatest college football team of all-time: the 1995 Nebraska Cornhuskers. I find it hard to call Manning a "loser" when discussing his college career. |
|
|