More you be the floor

[SumZero]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Floor ruled that not only the 50 in chips that the CO put in the pot but 100 in chips needed to be put in because the player was attempting to call the BB. Not the 300 that would have been a call of my (the LP in the story) raise, and not the 50 in chips that I was expecting would be the ruling, but 100 in chips.


[/ QUOTE ] Correct ruling.

[/ QUOTE ]

So is the reasoning that a 50 call is less than the minimum bet but a 100 chip would be the minimum limp. I.e., the guy was limping out of turn and then the bet arrived at him? Would it have mattered if someone else in EP had raised before he put the 50 chips out (again if he put them out while LP was thinking/getting ready to raise)?