#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Is there anything more ridonkulous than the mid-limits in AC?
OK all you Einsteins:
From page 105 of Stox "Winning in Tough Hold'em Games" Defending from the Big Blind: High limit, short handed player (similar results for mid, low and grinder): 43off suit 287 trials winning %: 1.74% Amount won/(lost): ($33,979) Avg $ per hand: ($118.39), that's a loss! Big bet per hand: (0.50) loser W%When Seeing the Flop:29.41% Went to Showdown:35.29% Won at Show down: 50% 43suited 102 trials winning %: 15.69% Amount won/(lost): ($8,529) Avg $ per hand: ($83.62), that's a loss! Big bet per hand: (0.45) loser W%When Seeing the Flop:32.65% Went to Showdown:16.33% Won at Show down: 62.5% If it won 50% at show down that's great. However in this case I believe the BB hit his pair on the flop. However, I interpret this data as; if you call from the big blind defending against a raise, you lose big time, especially if you don't hit your 4-3, suited or unsuited. Discuss amongst yourselves...Please analyze and explain why this is a profitable call when defending the big blind. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|