#1
|
|||
|
|||
BB defense turns B2P 5-way
SB is a TAG
HJ is a passive fish CO is about 90/70/5 over a few dozen hands Button (raiser) is 20/15/1.5 I've only seen button villain SD 1 hand on a different table (he seems pretty nitty). He stole from button with a weak Ace, flopped bottom pair, the flop was monotone, he bet flop and checked behind turn & river and won UI. Cryptologic Limit Holdem Ring game Limit: $2/$4 6 players Converter Pre-flop: (6 players) kimchi is BB with 6[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 4[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] UTG folds, UTG+1 calls, CO calls, <font color="#cc0000">Button raises</font>, SB calls, kimchi calls, UTG+1 calls, CO calls. Flop: T[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 9[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 4[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] (10SB, 5 players) SB checks, kimchi checks, UTG+1 checks, CO checks, <font color="#cc0000">Button bets</font>, SB calls, kimchi calls, UTG+1 calls, CO calls. Turn: 6[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] (7.5BB, 5 players) SB checks, <font color="#cc0000">kimchi donks</font> How about this turn donk? I had a feeling villain might check behind here. The board is pretty co-ordinated now and unless villain has an overpair or something like AT, FD or QJ I doubt he's betting much else, and I'm probably not going to get the opportunity to C/R and protect my very vulnerable hand. If the board on the turn looked more like something he would bet again, then a turn C/R might have been better. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|