#51
|
|||
|
|||
Re: November Goals Threat!
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I just got back into limit this month to try hitting nova on stars, did well but had a low 2.6BB/100 8 tabling. I want to work on it for next month to hit 4+BB/100 [/ QUOTE ] rofl [/ QUOTE ] whats so funny yourface? that i suck enough to have that low of a winrate? |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
Re: November Goals Threat!
u can run up the VPP quicker in limit, i logged 25K hands and only have 14VPP to get thru december so i am going to reach my goal
|
#53
|
|||
|
|||
Re: November Goals Threat!
if your true winrate is 2.6BB/100 you will be one of the very best
|
#54
|
|||
|
|||
Re: November Goals Threat!
[ QUOTE ]
if your true winrate is 2.6BB/100 you will be one of the very best [/ QUOTE ] really? well i havent played limit for a while, its where i originally built my roll, i saw u and oink post 5+BB for the past 5-10K hands and i wasnt sure what a good winrate was for a good limit player so i thought that might be normal, thanks for clearing that up then, i meant to ask about it. |
#55
|
|||
|
|||
Re: November Goals Threat!
[ QUOTE ]
1. Play good. [/ QUOTE ] Bahh, kind of. Big downswings tilts me tho. [ QUOTE ] 2. Run good. [/ QUOTE ] Check at HU. fu AP. [ QUOTE ] 3. Don't tilt. [/ QUOTE ] fu AP [ QUOTE ] 4. Get Stox' book. [/ QUOTE ] Check - halfway through it. [ QUOTE ] 5. Actually read some finance. [/ QUOTE ] lol [ QUOTE ] 6. Spend more time with gf and still get poker hours in (goodbye classes). [/ QUOTE ] Got rid of gf but still no classes. [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img] [ QUOTE ] 7. Get drunk more than usual. [/ QUOTE ] Not nearly enough! [ QUOTE ] EDIT: 8. Post more in here. [/ QUOTE ] Not good enough either. |
#56
|
|||
|
|||
Re: November Goals Threat!
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] if your true winrate is 2.6BB/100 you will be one of the very best [/ QUOTE ] really? well i havent played limit for a while, its where i originally built my roll, i saw u and oink post 5+BB for the past 5-10K hands and i wasnt sure what a good winrate was for a good limit player so i thought that might be normal, thanks for clearing that up then, i meant to ask about it. [/ QUOTE ] I will be a very happy man if I run t +2BB/100 long term |
#57
|
|||
|
|||
Re: November Goals Threat!
[ QUOTE ]
1. 40k hands at 1+bb/100 [/ QUOTE ] not quite on either front. 27k hands at .55 bb/100. Unfortunately, I'm basically breakeven money wise because of the 3k hands of 10/20 I played at -5 bb/100 [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img] [ QUOTE ] 2. Play less [/ QUOTE ] Check - one week self ban will do that [ QUOTE ] 3. Tilt less [/ QUOTE ] Nix - see 2 supra [ QUOTE ] 4. Mix some NL back in [/ QUOTE ] 6k hands of NL100 at 10+ ptbb/100, holla [ QUOTE ] 5. Stop hating my job [/ QUOTE ] El Oh El [ QUOTE ] 6. Net +10k [/ QUOTE ] Might net half that if I run well today and tomorrow... |
#58
|
|||
|
|||
Re: November Goals Threat!
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] if your true winrate is 2.6BB/100 you will be one of the very best [/ QUOTE ] really? well i havent played limit for a while, its where i originally built my roll, i saw u and oink post 5+BB for the past 5-10K hands and i wasnt sure what a good winrate was for a good limit player so i thought that might be normal, thanks for clearing that up then, i meant to ask about it. [/ QUOTE ] I will be a very happy man if I run t +2BB/100 long term [/ QUOTE ] Yeah, I don't think you'll find a single reg here who has a record of significantly higher than 2 bb/100 in the low-medium stakes games. I mean, I think a lot of us COULD squeeze out 3-4 bb/100 single tabling with nitty game selection, but that's burning money |
#59
|
|||
|
|||
Re: November Goals Threat!
good to hear, i guess i ran and played well this month then, hopefully same next month as i stay at 5/10 and try out some 10/20
|
#60
|
|||
|
|||
Re: November Goals Threat!
[ QUOTE ]
good to hear, i guess i <font color="black">RAN</font> and played well this month then, hopefully same next month as i stay at 5/10 and try out some 10/20 [/ QUOTE ] I'm sure you played fine, but those results necessarily indicate running great while only suggesting playing well...sample size, etc... |
|
|