#21
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Is this too spewy?
wow flop is complete s[pew
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Is this too spewy?
I'm usually pretty spewy and even I think this is spewy.
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Is this too spewy?
The call on the flop just doesn't do it for me. I don't see a naked 7 sticking around to catch here, you'd have made on the flop. When he pushes back on that flop, I'm going to chaulk this one up as a failed cbet and be done with it there.
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Is this too spewy?
fold flop yo
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Is this too spewy?
i hope this guy can't read hands.
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Is this too spewy?
[ QUOTE ]
i hope this guy can't read hands. [/ QUOTE ] you check back the turn w/ ur overpairs then i assume? |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Is this too spewy?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] i hope this guy can't read hands. [/ QUOTE ] you check back the turn w/ ur overpairs then i assume? [/ QUOTE ] I do, unless I think villain is a total spewtard that'd be check/raising with any pair and then c/c'ing the turn. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Is this too spewy?
If his reraise is a bluf, this still isn't the board to float/raise him on.
|
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Is this too spewy?
I have a general comment on the "if I had a 7 that's how I'd play" type of bluff.
If you had a 7, you'd bet hoping it would be called by a weaker hand, right? And you know you won't be called by air, and usually, not raised by air. I believe, if you represent a wide range of hands that beat your opponent (like, if you have a set, a 7, an overpair, two pair, you could play like that) then bluffs are better than the situations where you would value bet one hand, and usually c/c others. I think if your opponent beats an overpair (which he usually does), you usually can't make it fold. Which makes this bluff a bad bluff, imho. |
|
|