#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 65s 3-bet Light
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] -Villains stats show he probably doesn't have an ace. [/ QUOTE ]I'm interested in how you get to this conclusion? [/ QUOTE ] he's aggressive postflop, so it seems unlikely he'd flat AK here. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 65s 3-bet Light
i like betting the turn, but i disagree that this villain probably folds to the 3-bet a lot. i would be more apt to call preflop and try to hit a big hand...his range may be wide but he is probably going crazy on a lot of flops and turns also, so i think you have pretty good implied odds.
if you have some read however that villain is a good lag, that would fold preflop alot its fine. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 65s 3-bet Light
I dont like 3betting an UTG raiser whos almost never going to fold to your 3bet
as played, bet turn and its NOT EVEN CLOSE |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 65s 3-bet Light
[ QUOTE ]
checking this turn leads to triangles [/ QUOTE ] Are we talking about PokerEV triangles here? I read about not being aggressive postflop leading to triangles twice now. I don't know the reasoning behind it. Can anybody explain if they know? |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 65s 3-bet Light
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] checking this turn leads to triangles [/ QUOTE ] Are we talking about PokerEV triangles here? I read about not being aggressive postflop leading to triangles twice now. I don't know the reasoning behind it. Can anybody explain if they know? [/ QUOTE ] Yes, PokerEV triangles. Not being aggressive enough in clear spots where you have initiative and can take the pot down without a showdown lead to the "triangle." The more pots you win without showdown, the higher your green line (total winnings) goes without moving where the blue (all in winnings)/red lines(sklansky bucks) are. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 65s 3-bet Light
Does that also work the other way around?
I mean, if you do have a triangle, does that necessarily mean you are not being aggressive enough postflop, or could that have other reasons? Btw ty [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] While I am at it, I want to ask another thing: I don't think I really understand what's meant by saying "be more aggresive postflop". My overall AF is like 2.56, turn and river like 1/3 of flop. Now, I am not sure if that means not calling bets or making more bets, for me specifically. I am not sure if I could explain, but isn't there any other metric to measure whether my lack of aggression is a product of calling bets or not betting. Because both would lead to less turn/river AF. I could still get coached btw [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] Just need to find somebody trustworthy. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 65s 3-bet Light
Bet exactly 32.25 on the turn
|
|
|