#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: stacked off on turn........standard?
[ QUOTE ]
I'm trying to think how many buyins you'd need to be playing for to fold this on the turn... probably 4-5+. [/ QUOTE ] probably more if sizing remains the same, because you're making it like 300 when you 3bet the turn. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: stacked off on turn........standard?
you're joking, right? he obviously has 45.
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: stacked off on turn........standard?
[ QUOTE ]
you're joking, right? he obviously has 45. [/ QUOTE ] who are you talking to? |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: stacked off on turn........standard?
i was being sarcastic. you were way ahead of his range obv.
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: stacked off on turn........standard?
no, its cool even if u were serious. i just wasnt sure what you were refering to.
yeah, his stats was 47/35.......with that being said, i just cant see getting away from my hand........even though i didnt exactly like it. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: stacked off on turn........standard?
Seems fine.
Can the player ever have AK here it is impossible to get away from it. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: stacked off on turn........standard?
Totally standard.
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: stacked off on turn........standard?
I think it depends a lot on whether you think he thinks you'll stack off with one pair here. If your image is such that you wouldn't play AK this way and that AJ is by far the most likely hand you have, then he wouldn't play A2/A3 this way, and you can be sure you're behind to the 45 or set.
Furthermore, if I didn't think he would stack off with a weak two pair, I think you can fold this. Obviously can't do this in a vacuum or to a strong, aggressive opponent, but, I'm just saying its not impossible to get away here. |
|
|