#61
|
|||
|
|||
Re: WCOOP threads???
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Why do people assume stars or 2p2 lawyers? I instantly assumed it was the lawyers for the player who was caught cheating. [/ QUOTE ] And you might be right. But we can't say for sure since the mods don't think it's necessary to let us know what actually happened. If lawyers are involved, I can understand that they might not be able to give details. But if you take publicly available posts down due to a request from somebody's lawyers, there's still no legal reason not to explain who asked you to do it, right? [/ QUOTE ] just when the poker world needs some transparency to get through it's toughest test.... [/ QUOTE ] Mat Sklansky Administrator: [ QUOTE ] lawyers made them go away. that's the bottom line. [/ QUOTE ] Dynasty: [ QUOTE ] The lawyer did not represent PokerStars. Also, the threads still exist in the mod forum and can be returned in the future. [/ QUOTE ] Mike Haven: [ QUOTE ] I have spent a great deal of time and effort reading all the relevant threads for the past ten minutes and I can assure you that in my opinion nothing is wrong and nothing has been said or done by anyone that is of any consequence. [/ QUOTE ] wtf? gg |
#62
|
|||
|
|||
Re: WCOOP threads???
OK, I think this thread has run it's course.
Its not entertaining me anymore, please lock it. |
#63
|
|||
|
|||
Re: WCOOP threads???
[ QUOTE ]
OK, I think this thread has run it's course. Its not entertaining me anymore, please lock it. [/ QUOTE ] why not just bin it with all the others so I have no visible posts again?! |
#64
|
|||
|
|||
Re: WCOOP threads???
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] OK, I think this thread has run it's course. Its not entertaining me anymore, please lock it. [/ QUOTE ] why not just bin it with all the others so I have no visible posts again?! [/ QUOTE ] Who is actyper? |
#65
|
|||
|
|||
Re: WCOOP threads???
Somebody in the zoo mentioned that this topic is now in cardplayer magazine.
Are we still not allowed to talk about it? OMGZZ!!! 2+2 might get sued for something that everyone else is already talking about!!! Note - I'm obviously not privy to whose lawyers requested whom to do what for whatver reason or specific post. But it still seems really silly that 2+2 is covering up a thread that didn't seem to contain any revelutionary information that isn't/wasn't already out there elsewhere. |
#66
|
|||
|
|||
Re: WCOOP threads???
TTHRIC
|
#67
|
|||
|
|||
Re: WCOOP threads???
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] OK, I think this thread has run it's course. Its not entertaining me anymore, please lock it. [/ QUOTE ] why not just bin it with all the others so I have no visible posts again?! [/ QUOTE ] Who is actyper? [/ QUOTE ] I guess I am, why? |
#68
|
|||
|
|||
Re: WCOOP threads???
So there's a void where the void threads used to be.
|
#69
|
|||
|
|||
Re: WCOOP threads???
[ QUOTE ]
So there's a void where the void threads used to be. [/ QUOTE ] [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] rofl [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] |
#70
|
|||
|
|||
Re: WCOOP threads???
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] OK, I think this thread has run it's course. Its not entertaining me anymore, please lock it. [/ QUOTE ] why not just bin it with all the others so I have no visible posts again?! [/ QUOTE ] Who is actyper? [/ QUOTE ] I guess I am, why? [/ QUOTE ] Right, was that question directed to me or a missquote?? I'm lost |
|
|