|
|
#51
09-17-2007, 12:16 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Macro Evolution Epihpanypy.
[ QUOTE ]
Such as? [/ QUOTE ] Creation myth. Flood myth. Tower of Babel myth. Exodus myth. Have you read this yet? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Objections_to_evolution 
|
|
#52
09-17-2007, 12:19 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Macro Evolution Epihpanypy.
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] #3 is an unacceptable response [/ QUOTE ] No kidding. Alert the media. [ QUOTE ] we have other, irrefutable examples of ring species. [/ QUOTE ] If you mean other than human, maybe, maybe not. I don't care a lot. Show it for us. [/ QUOTE ] Don't worry, there is no way to refute your claim. ( which is one reason it is valueless) luckyme
|
|
#53
09-17-2007, 12:23 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Macro Evolution Epihpanypy.
[ QUOTE ]
Creation myth. Flood myth. Tower of Babel myth. Exodus myth. [/ QUOTE ] Question begging myth. [ QUOTE ] Have you read this yet? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Objections_to_evolution [/ QUOTE ] I think I glanced through it once.
|
|
#55
09-17-2007, 12:41 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Macro Evolution Epihpanypy.
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Don't worry, there is no way to refute your claim. ( which is one reason it is valueless) [/ QUOTE ] Which? [/ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] 3. The line does not extend back 7 million years. At some point a human woman appeared who had no mother. [/ QUOTE ] Dat de one. [/ QUOTE ] luckyme
|
|
#56
09-17-2007, 12:46 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Macro Evolution Epihpanypy.
[ QUOTE ]
Which? Quote: Quote: 3. The line does not extend back 7 million years. At some point a human woman appeared who had no mother. Dat de one. [/ QUOTE ] You can discredit the Bible by showing something it claims is definitely wrong. This can be done with the Book of Mormon and the Koran. Or, you could weaken the claim severely by proving human evolution. Then again, your claim is irrefutable since you require no evidence.
|
|
#57
09-17-2007, 01:00 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Macro Evolution Epihpanypy.
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I have yet to see any creationist site prove anything except their complete lack of understanding of how evolution actually works. [/ QUOTE ] You haven't looked at reasons.org. [/ QUOTE ] I've scanned a few articles there, and seen nothing so far to change my opinion. There fallacies seem to be a little higher-level than most.
|
|
#58
09-17-2007, 01:03 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Macro Evolution Epihpanypy.
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Which? Quote: Quote: 3. The line does not extend back 7 million years. At some point a human woman appeared who had no mother. Dat de one. [/ QUOTE ] You can discredit the Bible by showing something it claims is definitely wrong. This can be done with the Book of Mormon and the Koran. Or, you could weaken the claim severely by proving human evolution. Then again, your claim is irrefutable since you require no evidence. [/ QUOTE ] The claim you make does not depend on the Bible, a sausage could make it. Human evolution is not provable to anyone that dismisses science, as they have the right to do. luckyme
|
|
#59
09-17-2007, 01:07 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Macro Evolution Epihpanypy.
[ QUOTE ]
Are there any scientists who disagree with the theory of evolution on any non religious wholly scientific grounds? [/ QUOTE ] I imagine there are some somewhere. Science has as many crackpots (maybe more) as any other field of endeavor. But most of the "scientists" who disagree with evolution that I've run across seem to disagree primarily on the basis of religious belief and then try to find evidence to support their faith-based disagreement, which, IMO is not science at all.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
