|
View Poll Results: traz | |||
Exactly what I expected | 0 | 0% | |
Pretty much what I expected | 2 | 8.70% | |
Kinda what I expected | 2 | 8.70% | |
Not really what I expected | 11 | 47.83% | |
Definitely not what I expected | 8 | 34.78% | |
Voters: 23. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#131
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Beat: Absolute is *actually* rigged (serious) (read me)
WTF ABSOLUTE....HYACHACHACHCHCACHCA
Maybe Gguouyd25 too? |
#132
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Beat: Absolute is *actually* rigged (serious) (read me)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] i lost 30k to this guy.... absolute is in trouble [/ QUOTE ] sound the drums, we're off to war [/ QUOTE ] gogogogo Adanthar. Class action FTW? |
#133
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Beat: Absolute is *actually* rigged (serious) (read me)
weren't there similar suspicions awhile back about some character referred to as DERB? don't know what site, but I think it was high stakes limit HE. uh, whatever happened with that?
|
#134
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Beat: Absolute is *actually* rigged (serious) (read me)
STAGE #756132137: HOLDEM NO LIMIT $30 - 2007-09-07 19:24:31 (ET)
Table: BEATY AVE (Real Money) Seat #5 is the dealer Seat 5 - GGOUOYD25 ($2248 in chips) Seat 6 - HOWDUZZYDOIT ($2149.74 in chips) Seat 1 - ALEX1212111 ($7914 in chips) Seat 2 - POKERSKIBUM ($8421 in chips) Seat 3 - DOUBLEDRAG ($7024 in chips) Seat 4 - MIRADAMAMA ($919 in chips) HOWDUZZYDOIT - Posts small blind $15 ALEX1212111 - Posts big blind $30 *** POCKET CARDS *** Dealt to ALEX1212111 [3c 8h] POKERSKIBUM - Raises $90 to $90 DOUBLEDRAG - Raises $180 to $180 MIRADAMAMA - Folds GGOUOYD25 - Folds HOWDUZZYDOIT - Folds ALEX1212111 - Folds POKERSKIBUM - Raises $910 to $1000 DOUBLEDRAG - Calls $820 *** FLOP *** [4h 2c 2h] POKERSKIBUM - Bets $1500 DOUBLEDRAG - Raises $3300 to $3300 POKERSKIBUM - All-In(Raise) $5921 to $7421 DOUBLEDRAG - All-In $2724 POKERSKIBUM - returned ($1397) : not called *** TURN *** [4h 2c 2h] [Qs] *** RIVER *** [4h 2c 2h Qs] [6d] *** SHOW DOWN *** POKERSKIBUM - Shows [As Ks] (One pair, twos) DOUBLEDRAG - Shows [4c 4d] (Full house, fours full of twos) DOUBLEDRAG Collects $14090 from main pot Nice preflop. |
#135
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Beat: Absolute is *actually* rigged (serious) (read me)
Integrity
You can feel safe playing at Absolute Poker. Great care has been taken to provide our players with the safest place to play poker online. Integrity is a key part of our mission statement and will continue to be our focus as we strive to continue to be the best and most trusted online poker site in the market. When the stakes are on the line, we have gone, and will continue to go to great lengths to do everything possible to offer the most honest and fair games played on the web. Our security and safety measures and procedures are constantly reviewed and updated regularly to ensure that our players have a safe place to play poker. A strong competitive advantage is obvious when taking a closer look at the measures taken in respect to banking, collusion, hackers & the randomness of our card shuffling software at Absolute Poker. Hackers Absolute Poker is secure in the transfer of any information between its players and our Absolute servers. We utilize the internationally accepted industry standard SSLv3/TLSv1 encryption algorithm to protect your information as it transfers between our client application running on your computer and our servers. So whether it is credit card, your name, password, your cards, your personal address and any other private information is protected. Player cards are sent directly and exclusively to the individual player's computer without ever being susceptible of being hacked. Also no other computer playing at your table can see your face down cards. This security is the best available and prevents any hacking and ultimately collusion to take place. Card Shuffling It is critical for card shuffling to take place using a shuffle algorithm as part of our software. This shuffling algorithm is fair and unpredictable. Please see our RNG certificate. There is no deck of cards that is shuffled as thoroughly as the Absolute Poker algorithm shuffles our cards. Each game, the deck is shuffled 10 times with each shuffle moving each card somewhere between 1 and 51 times throughout the deck (10 passes at Knuth's full shuffle algorithm). In addition to the shuffling algorithm, Absolute Poker uses a random number generator. The entropy pool needs to be large enough to allow it to be impossible for any player to have an advantage over the other players. Absolute Poker's Random Number Generator has been fully certified as random by a well known third party, Technical Testing Systems, Inc, http://www.tstglobal.com/. If you have any questions with regard to any integrity or security issues, please do not hesitate to contact us . |
#136
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Beat: Absolute is *actually* rigged (serious) (read me)
RiverFenix, I dont think your post applies here. We're talking about seeing hole cards, not the rng or safety of our credit card numbers.
|
#137
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Beat: Absolute is *actually* rigged (serious) (read me)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] i lost 30k to this guy.... absolute is in trouble [/ QUOTE ] sound the drums, we're off to war [/ QUOTE ]' I lost 3k |
#138
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Beat: Absolute is *actually* rigged (serious) (read me)
Just thought someone may want to read it as I did.
Also it helps narrow down the possibilities of how a person has hole card information. Superaccounts becoming more plausible than cracking the RNG. Hacking the server is of course possible as well. I really doubt we'll ever see another poker sites RNG cracked again (was it planetpoker?). |
#139
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Beat: Absolute is *actually* rigged (serious) (read me)
having played on absolute a bunch, and some hands with accounts mentioned...not real thrilled.
|
#140
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Beat: Absolute is *actually* rigged (serious) (read me)
ok, so i don't have the hand histories (i've had some computer problems), but i've just sent an email to AP asking for them. I'll post relevant hands/stats when i can.
Anyways, DOUBLEDRAG or double-someting, his name has been listed before is also one of these accounts. He was raising literally every hand preflop. He was the reason the game was there. He never showed down a bad hand... not once, not [censored] once. I thought he was terrible so I sat down to play against him obv. I thought he was just getting lucky and I'd break him. |
|
|