#161
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Matusow wins Bad Beat jackpot
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] what if i hold K9 and opponent A9 on 99952 board... do i get the jackpot? it should be eglibe if the kicker counts [/ QUOTE ] What if the board is 9999A and I have a royal flush in my hand and villian has AAAA? [/ QUOTE ] You win the bbj of course. Quad aces full of quad nines are not only higher ranked than a royal, but even than five of a kind! Dumb question, that was really obvious. |
#162
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Matusow wins Bad Beat jackpot
[ QUOTE ]
wasting my 1k post to say lol [/ QUOTE ] Wasting my 5491st post to say you're retarded. |
#163
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Matusow wins Bad Beat jackpot
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] what if i hold K9 and opponent A9 on 99952 board... do i get the jackpot? it should be eglibe if the kicker counts [/ QUOTE ] What if the board is 9999A and I have a royal flush in my hand and villian has AAAA? [/ QUOTE ] You win the bbj of course. Quad aces full of quad nines are not only higher ranked than a royal, but even than five of a kind! Dumb question, that was really obvious. [/ QUOTE ] You misread hand, villian has AAAAA9999 not quad A's.. Then it would obv not be good vs royal+quads.. however 5A's + 49's is where I'm confused.. |
#164
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Matusow wins Bad Beat jackpot
Guys fulltilt doesnt have a bad beat jackpot, misleading thread title.
|
#165
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Matusow wins Bad Beat jackpot
[ QUOTE ]
To be clear- a lot of dicky card rooms do require that any quads payout (say for a Monte Carlo) be made with a pocket pair. Yes this is dumb, this is also reality. [/ QUOTE ] QFT back on page 2 - this is where some people are confused. It's common to see house BBJ's require a quads hand to have a pocket pair IN THE HOLE to qualify. And yes, just like any other time you play this game, the A plays. You still need 5 cards to make a hand. The posters having a problem with the first part might be live noobs, or maybe not used to playing around BBJs with this qualification so I can kinda understand. But if you can't assemble A9999 as the hand in question, you're wrong and should stop arguing. |
#166
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Matusow wins Bad Beat jackpot
Also, getting caught goofing up basic poker rules does not qualify as "leveling"
|
#167
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Matusow wins Bad Beat jackpot
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] HE IS USING BOTH WHOLE CARDS. [/ QUOTE ] if you don't get dealt whole cards, you're being ripped off [/ QUOTE ] I stopped reading right here. No way anything else in the rest of the thread will live up to this. |
#168
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Matusow wins Bad Beat jackpot
this thread makes me want to die
|
|
|