#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: bottom 2 + NFD
your going with this hand.
what you need to ask really is --should i have opened utg for a big raise with it. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: bottom 2 + NFD
Four handed anything else would be awfully weak.
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: bottom 2 + NFD
it has to be at least a set here surely? what else can he raise the max with, he may be aggro but he isnt stupid enough to raise with just flush draw
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: bottom 2 + NFD
At least a set? LOL. Can he never have a draw here? This is an instashove.
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: bottom 2 + NFD
i severely doubt it as he doesnt have nut flush draw and i just couldnt see someone making this play wihtout one or the other
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: bottom 2 + NFD
Why do you 'severely doubt' it? The K is not a diamond so there's no reason whatsoever that villain isn't thinking 'he may have just AA or be making a c-bet so I'll take him off his hand with plenty of outs', like Kx89 with the k-high flush draw? He really doesn't need the nfd in his range of draws to be making this move with just a draw. The guy is prescribed as a regular as well, so he doesn't just checkraise with sets. Which is noobish, in case you didn't know.
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: bottom 2 + NFD
You should fold you don't have the nuts.
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: bottom 2 + NFD
interesting how everybody says a shove is oh so standard, but... if you know your opponent ans are about 80% sure he has a set, a fold would be the only right thing to do... seriously, one who's able to fold in this spot.... Respect!
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: bottom 2 + NFD
yes, poker is easy when you know exactly what your opponent has every time
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: bottom 2 + NFD
some (not that few) opponents is not hard to have an 80% read on...
situational, our guy has a set here almost always, and I love the ability to fold in this spot, and I wish I had it.... again.. respect to the one who can! cause being all in on a draw you figure has 7 outs obviously is super spew..... |
|
|