#1
|
|||
|
|||
50NL 10s on low boards
Villan is 47.2/15.8/4 over 100 hands. have seen him show down with very loose cards. i felt confidently ahead in this hand but checked for pot control. any ideas? and is this the correct way to play this hand?
Full Tilt Poker - No Limit Hold'em Cash Game - $0.25/$0.50 Blinds - 5 Players - (LegoPoker Hand History Converter) Hero (SB): $81.05 BB: $102.40 UTG: $50.00 CO: $19.25 BTN: $77.40 Preflop: Hero is dealt T[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] T[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] (5 Players) 2 folds, <font color="red">BTN raises to $2.00</font>, <font color="red">Hero raises to $6.50</font>, BB calls $6.00, BTN folds Flop: ($15) 5[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 7[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 5[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] (2 Players) Hero checks, <font color="red">BB bets $7.50</font>, Hero calls $7.50 Turn: ($30) 4[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] (2 Players) Hero checks, <font color="red">BB bets $15.00</font>, Hero calls $15.00 River: ($60) 8[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (2 Players) <font color="red">Hero bets all-in for $52.05</font>, |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 50NL 10s on low boards
Cbet Flop>>>>>CR flop>C/C.
As played, I hate river shove. You have no idea where you really stand in hand. He could have monster. And his half pot bets tell you nothing. I prefer c/c river to this. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 50NL 10s on low boards
I don't know how you know where you are without ever betting. If you are the PF agressor, you should be continuation betting 100% of the time in a headsup pot.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 50NL 10s on low boards
[ QUOTE ]
If you are the PF agressor, you should be continuation betting 100% of the time in a headsup pot. [/ QUOTE ] Agreed, cbet flop |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 50NL 10s on low boards
That river shove is disgusting. Just check it down and show it off for cheap or CRAI if you think he's betting with a weaker hand. C/C, C/C, All-in lines always are so transparent. You basically turned TT into a bluff on the river. He's not going to call with anything worse.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 50NL 10s on low boards
Why didnt you lead the flop?
I think c/r is better than c/c with the intent to open push the river. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 50NL 10s on low boards
I think the trouble with checking this flop is that although villain is very loose and also aggressive postflop, your 3-bet preflop is quite likely to have alerted him to the fact that you have a big hand and therefore he is more likely to checkbehind that he normally would be. If you do check, then you should check-raise to 25-30 imo, this charges overcards to see the next card, if he is so loose that he wil call the raise with them, and even if he didn't it would still be the correct play if you decide to check.
imo against this opponent: leading flop >>> check raise>>>>>>check-call |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 50NL 10s on low boards
You are 150bbs deep.
Lead the damn flop. River is a spew. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 50NL 10s on low boards
Bet the flop.
As played the river shove is pretty atrocious. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 50NL 10s on low boards
Agreed, lead the flop or check raise.
River as is speaks for its self. |
|
|