Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Tournament Poker > STT Strategy
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-27-2007, 01:27 PM
chewbaka chewbaka is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 7
Default $6.50 two hands bubble play

Hand 1

PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em Tourney, Big Blind is t400 (4 handed) Hand History Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com (Format: FlopTurnRiver)

Button (t6493)
SB (t2330)
Hero (t2892)
UTG (t1785)

Preflop: Hero is BB with As Qs
1 fold, Button raises to t4400, 1 fold, Hero ???

Hand 2

PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em Tourney, Big Blind is t400 (4 handed) Hand History Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com (Format: FlopTurnRiver Cards)

Button (t420)
SB (t5800)
Hero (t840)
UTG (t6440)

Preflop: Hero is BB with Ad 6d
UTG raises to t800, 2 folds, Hero ???
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-27-2007, 01:36 PM
johnnyknish johnnyknish is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 177
Default Re: $6.50 two hands bubble play

call the all in on the first, fold the second
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-27-2007, 01:45 PM
dj32 dj32 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 207
Default Re: $6.50 two hands bubble play

I think the second hand is a really tough spot. Johnny - are you suggesting we fold everything except something like QQ+, AK+, and hope the button blinds out before us?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-27-2007, 02:00 PM
raise_happy raise_happy is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 17
Default Re: $6.50 two hands bubble play

i'm pretty sure that the first hand is an easy all-in.

the second hand i'm not sure if i'm too weak, but i would fold, because there is the chance that the button blinds out before us and even if you double up your chances to get 1st or 2nd (when down to 3) won't increase that much with 1600 chips. if you bust now you loose everything.

if your stack was bigger and if an all-in would instead greatly increase your chances to get 1st or 2nd place i would push.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-27-2007, 03:31 PM
CheeseMoney CheeseMoney is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: 25 tabling yo mamas...
Posts: 721
Default Re: $6.50 two hands bubble play

[ QUOTE ]
i'm pretty sure that the first hand is an easy all-in.


[/ QUOTE ]

I'm pretty sure you mean "call" instead of "all-in", and I'm pretty sure you'd be way wrong to call this in a 6.5. Its hugely -EV if the guys pushing less than 50% of all hands, and if he's pushing 23o its less than the .3 minimum edge I'm willing to take in a 6.5, where donks make mistakes left and right at the bubble. I would only call if I knew his hand has an ace in it. In other words, hand 1 is a pretty clear fold.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-27-2007, 03:33 PM
BradleyT BradleyT is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Vote Ron Paul 08
Posts: 7,087
Default Re: $6.50 two hands bubble play

First hand he needs to be pushing 60% for it to be +.1%.

22+,A2+,K2+,Q2+,J5o+,J2s+,T7o+,T5s+,98o,96s+,87s

Unless you know he's a bully he's probably not pushing the lower ends of Q2,J5,J2s, etc.. which makes this a fold.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-27-2007, 03:39 PM
CheeseMoney CheeseMoney is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: 25 tabling yo mamas...
Posts: 721
Default Re: $6.50 two hands bubble play

BTW, I think hand 2 is a close fold, as he has to be minraising about > 40% to make this a decently + EV call, moving beyond ICM a little bit you have to factor in that the shortest stack will be in huge trouble if you let this go. There's a decent shot that shortie will be all in 3 way, and his chances of surviving that are worse than your chances of surviving heads up vs the big stack.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-27-2007, 03:41 PM
shakyamuni shakyamuni is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: long gone...
Posts: 276
Default Re: $6.50 two hands bubble play

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
i'm pretty sure that the first hand is an easy all-in.


[/ QUOTE ]

I'm pretty sure you mean "call" instead of "all-in", and I'm pretty sure you'd be way wrong to call this in a 6.5. Its hugely -EV if the guys pushing less than 50% of all hands, and if he's pushing 23o its less than the .3 minimum edge I'm willing to take in a 6.5, where donks make mistakes left and right at the bubble. I would only call if I knew his hand has an ace in it. In other words, hand 1 is a pretty clear fold.

[/ QUOTE ]

Agreed - Hand 1 he's got to be raising wider than 50% - fold it...

Hand 2 UTG has to be min-raising like 35% to make it ev neutral (40% for any real edge)- read might help....

at this point it might be better to see if the other shorty busts, he'll be all in, in the bb in two hands...
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-27-2007, 03:41 PM
NoSetNoBet NoSetNoBet is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Live low limit, where I belong
Posts: 148
Default Re: $6.50 two hands bubble play

[ QUOTE ]
i'm pretty sure that the first hand is an easy all-in.

[/ QUOTE ]

You cannot go all-in in the first hand, but rather you can only call or fold, and this makes a huge difference on the bubble. This is an easy fold. Had the big stack folded, it would be an easy open-push. In this spot you should be pushing wide and calling very narrow, especially against the one stack who has you covered.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-27-2007, 03:54 PM
BradleyT BradleyT is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Vote Ron Paul 08
Posts: 7,087
Default Re: $6.50 two hands bubble play

Yeah hand 1 is definitely one where you need to visualize a line chart.

Best - 100% = +.3%
Neutral - 55% = 0%
Bad - 22+,A2s+,A3o+,KTs+, KJo+,QJs+ = -1.6%
Worst - TT+ = -10.8%
OMFG - AA+ = -18.7%
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.