#161
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A Good BB/100 at 100NL FR
|
#162
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A Good BB/100 at 100NL FR
[ QUOTE ]
hey does anybody know where I can find the post from awhile back that had all the stats for the high stakes fr players on stars? I think someone had datamined them or something! I am horrible at usuing the search feature on this site, does anyone know where I can find it? it should put in perspective the discussion here also! [/ QUOTE ] pretty small samplesizes in it, and the 25/50game is very erratic in terms of #of players |
#163
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A Good BB/100 at 100NL FR
tx Phresh, those stats are so inspiring. but wow I never thought people at those tables play such Laggy styles!! and be a big winner over 108K hands like Rekrul thats pretty amazing!!
|
#164
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A Good BB/100 at 100NL FR
So look, I think its half hysterical and half serious how far this post of mine has gone. I think that some of you may have been confusing some of the things I was saying. Then a lot of you loaded up the trusty 'ol PT and told me I was X/X/X and "super-nitty" and blah-blah-blah. But the truth is that NONE of your PT numbers on me are correct because you have only been on the tables with me for a certain number of hands. 7500 hands is obv not enough to make a clear determination about how i play or run. One of you said I was a loser after 7500 hands and one of you had me at a winner after 3500 hands. I dont see how you guys can put so much faith and assumption into those stats until you have like maybe 20K hands on a person. Anyway, since i have been tracking, this is how I am running, and I simply want honest, REAL feedback on it (please keep in mind that this is not the only poker I have ever played... I have only been tracking for a few weeks now... i am actually quite experienced):
Cummulative Cash Results (since May, 30th): Hands: 30,587@ 100NL +/-: +$1142.50 Hrs: 40hrs 10min Rakeback: ~$555.00 Winrate: 3.74BB/100 (1.87ptBB/100) Now my winrate may not be the monster WR's ive seen some of you guys post, but the way i see it is, if im playing 4K to 6K hands a day (which is 5 to 7 hours) then my point is that i dont HAVE to have a giganto winrate to make a lot of money. This is the way I am thinking: IF i run at ONLY 1ptBB/100 (which is $17/hr as i am seeing 850 hands/hr 12-tabling 100NL FR) and also making $14/hr in RB (while 12-tabling of course) then I am making ~$30/hr TOTAL. Is there anything wrong with this analysis or point-of-view towards the game? Am i seeing things all wrong? I would like as much feedback as possible on this. |
#165
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A Good BB/100 at 100NL FR
[ QUOTE ]
13/4/0.63 [/ QUOTE ] [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] Is MT2R the reason this discussion has gone the wrong way?? [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img] |
#166
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A Good BB/100 at 100NL FR
my math kind of sucks but 16days 30.5k hands isn't even close to 4k-6khands a day
|
#167
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A Good BB/100 at 100NL FR
[ QUOTE ]
my math kind of sucks but 16days 30.5k hands isn't even close to 4k-6khands a day [/ QUOTE ] ya, you're right. i havent played 4-6k hands everyday. i have only started to do that recently, and not with a lot of success, but i am working on trying to discipline myself. you seem very experienced bottomset, what are your other thoughts on my lengthy post? |
#168
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A Good BB/100 at 100NL FR
I would like to see the sim that GoT did. Whatever happened to him anyways?
|
#169
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A Good BB/100 at 100NL FR
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] 13/4/0.63 [/ QUOTE ] [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] Is MT2R the reason this discussion has gone the wrong way?? [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] yep...i hate winrate threads |
#170
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A Good BB/100 at 100NL FR
[ QUOTE ]
I would like to see the sim that GoT did. Whatever happened to him anyways? [/ QUOTE ] oh man I don't remember which forum he posted it on, or how long ago it was so it'll take me a while to find it he left the site for a while but Im pretty sure he's back posting again, I met him in Vegas he has a ton of gamble in him, and is unbelievably sick good at poker |
|
|