#31
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 3 commerce hands
maybe this doesn't matter but in hand 2 do you have Qc?
|
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 3 commerce hands
IMO it definitely matters and I was wondering the same thing..
|
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 3 commerce hands
also, not sure if this is way off, but in hand one if hes the BB (or maybe even sb) can he have 56s (busted str8, no clubs) a lot of the time? or rather, enough to make this call easily profitable combined with the fact this is a typical donk bet, and normally means flush but could easily be a strange block bet as well.
also immediatly upon lookin at hand 3 i liked it. but not as a bluff at all, so liek strassa said, if thats what people think it is maybe im crazy. |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 3 commerce hands
[ QUOTE ]
are these tourney hands or cash game? I assume tourney, but not sure if this matters. [/ QUOTE ] lollerskatercopterthings. |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 3 commerce hands
Jason,
In hand 1, how often do you think he's peeling the flop with overcards? If that is possible, it seems that he might have a good K and wants to get value on the river, and doesn't want you to chk behind. Another possibility is a small/med pair calling for value on flop and turn that turned into a bluff on the river. |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 3 commerce hands
I'd call in the first one, fold the second one and I like the third (except for PF of course). I have no idea why dlpnyc is saying AxJc is being a likely hand for #2.
|
#37
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 3 commerce hands
I fold 1 since you only beat 65 or a very strangely played hand, call 2 with the Qc, fold without, and I think hand 3 is fine
|
#38
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 3 commerce hands
1) meh really close, raising, calling, and folding are all ok, but im more prone to raise a 2k bet than a 1400 bet. I think i probably call slightly more than i fold w/ given info.
2) I call turn and call most rivs w/ reads u gave... gene likes to 2 barrell in these spots imo, altho your obviously going to be shown a flush quite a bit. I really xpet to see Jt 1 or no clubs here a ton. 3) i like this kindve thing lot more online (where people realise that tt should be the same as 22). I still dont mind it but i think it might be a little too thin to do regularly (vgood occasionally though for metagame etc) |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 3 commerce hands
I call one, i guess call two to reevalutate (folding to a blank river bet from him after thinking for a while and checking), and I like the way you played hand three.
|
#40
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 3 commerce hands
I think hand 1 and 3 have been discussed thoroughly so hand 2 deserves a little bit more thought. I think checking the turn is fine here although I'd prefer betting out again. As played, I would check-raise the turn and assuming other player folds, push any non-club river. I think it's very clear Gene doesn't have the nut flush here (I don't see him limping Button with Kxcc, he'd be raising KJc KTc etc) and he'll have a tough time calling a c/r and a push without the nuts. He's also the type who's willing to part with medium flushes, which gives this line a high success rate. Of course, this line is based on the assumption that you don't have the Qc in this hand because I think you would have mentioned it if you did.
|
|
|