|
View Poll Results: The post was ignored because | |||
The theory is wrong | 0 | 0% | |
The theory is right, but nothing new | 7 | 53.85% | |
The post was too long | 5 | 38.46% | |
I hate stats | 1 | 7.69% | |
other | 0 | 0% | |
Voters: 13. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
FR and 6 max
Not the usual "what is more profitable question?". Having just switched over from NLHE I was wondering if the Omaha climate is the same among 2+2ers. In NLHE easily 2/3rds of 2+2ers play SH. Is this the same among PLO players (.50/1 - 2/4) or is there relatively more interest in FR?
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FR and 6 max
SH>6max>FR
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FR and 6 max
[ QUOTE ]
HU>SH>6max>FR [/ QUOTE ] |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FR and 6 max
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] HU>SH>6max>FR [/ QUOTE ] [/ QUOTE ] I think you have misunderstood my question. I wasn't asking which form of poker you think is best - it was purely a numbers question. In NLHE most 2+2ers gravitate towards the 6 max tables as opposed to full ring. My question was whether this trend holds true with 2+2ers who play PLO - or does full ring get a little more action with PLO? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FR and 6 max
well, i hvnt even read original post, but first noticed sc00t reply so i replied it to him [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]
about your question: why? you are afraid of 2+2 in Full ring or whatever? just play the game you good with and dont careabout anything. i belive most 2+2 plays 6max- |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FR and 6 max
Wires - I don't know what the answer to your question is.
You might try making a poll to see how many posters primarily play each type of game. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FR and 6 max
I tend to play 6-max most often since that's what's running the most, but it's definitely where my results are the worst. For some reason, I do great really short and I do well at FR, but the 5-6 handed games, I struggle with a little:
(all results in PTBB) HU : 26.4 BB/100 (2,100 hands) SH : 18.9 BB/100 (9,300 hands) FR : 15.3 BB/100 (3,200 hands) 6-max: 5.3 BB/100 (46,000 hands) I guess sample size could be a real issue here, but I definitely think there's something to it. Probably though, it's as simple as I play best short, but when I do play FR, it's because there's a really good game going. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FR and 6 max
No way you make 26 BB/100 heads up in the long run. That would be pretty sick.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FR and 6 max
to answer your original question, I think mostly 6 max. There are more 6 max games going on all sites and there are more 6 max HHs posted here. Although people here err on the nitty side, to say the least, so maybe more of them are playing FR than I thought.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FR and 6 max
I prefer and am better at full ring.
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|