|
|
|
|
#1
04-28-2006, 09:47 AM
|
|||
|
|||
How long did it take u to move from small limits to 40/80+
Just trying to see how long regulars in the hi limit games stayed at each lower limit level before moving up gradually.
Also, how many time did u have to move back down after getting beat up at higher limits? 
|
|
#4
04-28-2006, 12:08 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: How long did it take u to move from small limits to 40/80+
[ QUOTE ]
Your question should have asked number of hands instead [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] 800K and still not there yet. Krishan
|
|
#6
05-01-2006, 12:15 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: How long did it take u to move from small limits to 40/80+
i'm almost at 3k and this makes me feel much better. im running -.009 ev in small but i figure by 80ok ill at least be running 0 hahha.
|
|
#9
04-28-2006, 03:09 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: How long did it take u to move from small limits to 40/80+
I played about 70K hands at 15-30 (about half without PT so that's a bit of a guess), 25K hands at 30-60 and have currently logged about 25K hands at 50-100.
But I continued to make cashouts at usual intervals at each limit and never really set a goal of building an online BR in order to move up. I may or may not get up to 100-200. If it happens, fine. If not, no big deal. I am not going to stop cashing out in teh 50 games just so I can play 100-200. Also, if I run bad (and I am right now), then going back down to lower limits would be no biggie either. My goal with poker winnings is simple: use 'em to improve my family's quality of life. I see too many guys playing way too many hours for the sole purpose of building their poker bankroll in order to move up. Then, they finally get to a limit that they can't beat or just have a small edge in it and stay there (i.e. the Peter Principle). I think that most guys on these boards would have better lives if they stopped worrying about building their br in order to play bigger.
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
