|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
nl400 87s
Party Poker, $2/$4 NL Hold'em Cash Game, 6 Players
LegoPoker Hand History Converter SB: $445.80 BB: $249.95 Hero (UTG): $500.40 MP: $400 regular, tag, 20/16/2.9, i respect his play CO: $181.75 BTN: $437.40 CO posts $4 Pre-Flop: 8[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] 7[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] dealt to Hero (UTG) <font color="red">Hero raises to $16</font>, MP calls $16, CO calls $12, 3 folds Flop: ($54) 5[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] T[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 6[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] (3 Players) <font color="red">Hero bets $40</font>, MP calls $40, CO folds Turn: ($134) 2[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] (2 Players) Hero checks, <font color="red">MP bets $72</font>, <font color="red">Hero raises to $444.40 and is All-In</font> from time to time i mix in suited connectors utg when table conditions allow or Im feeling lucky. away from the table i dont like my turn play at all. i know he has at least a pair when he calls the flop. and i doubt he is calling w/ a mediocre hand w/ a player behind him still to act. he is probably only betting when he is strong. So is c/c best here or does the added fold equity (if any?) make a bet (or c/r as played) reasonable? how would you play QQ+ here? turn lead leaves pretty much exactly a PSB behind which isnt too good for us. So i think a c/r wouldnt be too bad. right? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: nl400 87s
I think you can just call here. I doubt he will fold 10 A or any of that.
I dont think it was a good move with all the draws. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: nl400 87s
I think it's great. UTG open looks strong, Cbet the flop, and Villain only bets 1/2 pot on a wet board = he can't call a turn shove, unless he hit a good turn cards with something like ATcc. Even if he calls, you hopefully have a lot of outs, so well played.
edit: I didn't notice pot was 3-way. His range should be a bit stronger obv, so I say lean more towards calling turn, but I still like the move. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: nl400 87s
Why a 2nd barrel isn't better than a c/r on the turn?
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: nl400 87s
[ QUOTE ]
Why a 2nd barrel isn't better than a c/r on the turn? [/ QUOTE ] more FE, and it's fun to gambooooool |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: nl400 87s
very standard
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: nl400 87s
[ QUOTE ]
Why a 2nd barrel isn't better than a c/r on the turn? [/ QUOTE ] because It has more fold equity than a Cbet, looks stronger, AND builds a bigger pot to take down. When villain shoves over his Cbet, hero is priced out of his huge draw (or can call very slim; either way it sucks) |
|
|