77 in deep 3bet pot - standard?

[schwza]

Poker Stars, $5/$10 NL Hold'em Cash Game, 5 Players
LegoPoker Hand History Converter

BTN: $2,450.15
SB: $557.25
BB: $414
UTG: $995
Hero (CO): $1,733.30

Pre-Flop: 7[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 7[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] dealt to Hero (CO)
UTG folds, <font color="red">Hero raises to $40</font>, <font color="red">BTN raises to $145</font>, 2 folds, Hero calls $105

Flop: ($305) 5[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 2[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] K[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (2 Players)
Hero checks, <font color="red">BTN bets $225</font>, Hero calls $225

Turn: ($755) T[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] (2 Players)
Hero checks, BTN checks

River: ($755) K[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (2 Players)
Hero checks, planning to c/f.

villain is tnetter. i think he is a decent reg, not out of line too often. should see me as same.

[Teh1337zor]

This is fine but I just c/f flop against a lot of people (not sure if this is too weak)

[xorbie]

showing this down sorta sucks if you plan on playing hands like this in the future.

[Borsig]

I just fold the flop..

[DanJ.]

[ QUOTE ]
I just fold the flop..

[/ QUOTE ]

ye same,deep oop Khigh flop in 3b pot = tehsuck

[schwza]

[ QUOTE ]
showing this down sorta sucks if you plan on playing hands like this in the future.

[/ QUOTE ]

what do you mean? i think this is a pretty normal way to play this. the other options i see are bluff river or fold flop and i think those are not very good.

[fslexcduck]

[ QUOTE ]
showing this down sorta sucks if you plan on playing hands like this in the future.

[/ QUOTE ]

not really as long as you would play 555 like this, which i probably would.

[Requin]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
showing this down sorta sucks if you plan on playing hands like this in the future.

[/ QUOTE ]

not really as long as you would play 555 like this, which i probably would.

[/ QUOTE ]Playing any king this way next time seems like a nice follow up to this hand, and more likely/easier to pull off than 555.

Also xorbie of course we're not playing hands like this in the future, the idea behind this hand is that we have a read that villain will, this ONE time (and maybe again like 100s of hands in the future), give us credit for a big hand when we c/c a K hi flop, and will not try to bluff us off a strong hand, i.e. will not be second barreling at all. As soon as he sees this hand that assumption vanishes unless villain is a retard, and without being super confident of that read this play is burning money. Although 77 is so small that it's probably still burning money to call the flop. Anyways, I guess I'm saying that THIS play is the deviation play or the meta-play, so it doesn't matter if we can't do this again in the future.

[TomChan]

you would check the river with 555?! [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]

imo taking that flop line, the river is pretty bad for us since if we check here, he knows we do not have a king/better and he might try to bluff us off our PP.
But a bet is also pretty bad since we get called by every single better hand, but no worse.

so plz better rivercard next time

[g-p]

i bet river, if i think he would call $600 with QQ then i would shove