Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Full Ring
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-17-2007, 03:27 PM
GrandMelon GrandMelon is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: getting coolered
Posts: 4,707
Default 400: Probably standard...

but just making sure. Villain is 19/3 over a few hundred hands, no other reads.

Poker Stars, $2/$4 NL Hold'em Cash Game, 8 Players
LegoPoker Hand History Converter

SB: $563.40
BB: $399.40
UTG: $190
UTG+1: $80
MP1: $767.80
Hero (MP2): $423.70
CO: $253.80
BTN: $1,036.90

Pre-Flop: J[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] Q[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] dealt to Hero (MP2)
3 folds, <font color="red">Hero raises to $16</font>, CO calls $16, BTN calls $16, 2 folds

Flop: ($54) J[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] J[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] 9[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (3 Players)
<font color="red">Hero bets $40</font>, CO calls $40, BTN folds

Turn: ($134) 8[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (2 Players)
Hero checks, <font color="red">CO bets $80</font>, Hero folds

Results: $134 Pot ($3 Rake)
CO mucked and WON $131 (+$75 NET)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-17-2007, 03:39 PM
BT2 BT2 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,745
Default Re: 400: Probably standard...

standard
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-17-2007, 03:51 PM
Mike Kelley Mike Kelley is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Reraising
Posts: 2,126
Default Re: 400: Probably standard...

I'm so confused.

How is this a fold?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-17-2007, 04:15 PM
too eazy too eazy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: triple beam dreamin\'
Posts: 838
Default Re: 400: Probably standard...

sometimes i'll bet/fold this turn. it's conceivable he can be floating with random pp's as i find a lot of people with those stats do, but yeah, if i was playing a ton of tables i'd probably almost always take this line.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-17-2007, 04:24 PM
CalledDownLight CalledDownLight is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: burning money in non-ring games
Posts: 4,541
Default Re: 400: Probably standard...

I'd have bet/folded.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-17-2007, 04:24 PM
Kos13 Kos13 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Purdue
Posts: 2,118
Default Re: 400: Probably standard...

Why not b/f instead?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-17-2007, 07:22 PM
boltonflats boltonflats is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 100
Default Re: 400: Probably standard...

i would have bet 95 or so, fold to re-raise, check river to call unless q or j of course.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-17-2007, 07:45 PM
CalledDownLight CalledDownLight is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: burning money in non-ring games
Posts: 4,541
Default Re: 400: Probably standard...

[ QUOTE ]
I'd have bet/folded.

[/ QUOTE ]

missed stacksizes. I'm now ok with just about any line other than this one.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-17-2007, 08:44 PM
gman339 gman339 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Sunny San Diego
Posts: 161
Default Re: 400: Probably standard...

[ QUOTE ]
I'm so confused.

How is this a fold?

[/ QUOTE ]
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-18-2007, 04:40 PM
Renton Renton is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA, USA
Posts: 1,717
Default Re: 400: Probably standard...

betfold as played fold
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:25 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.