|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Party $55: Level 2, JJ after LAG raiser and callers.
UTG+2 is a pretty bad LAG raising 25% preflop, the two callers are new to me, but have been playing pretty loose.
I guess I should have just pushed in instead of the 1200 raise, but I am commited anyways so don't think it makes much of a difference. Standard? Party Poker No-Limit Hold'em Tourney, Big Blind is t60 (10 handed) Hand History converter Courtesy of PokerZion.com MP2 (t1940) MP3 (t2380) CO (t2370) Button (t2140) Hero (t1940) BB (t2000) UTG (t1480) UTG+1 (t2650) UTG+2 (t940) MP1 (t2160) Preflop: Hero is SB with J[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], J[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]. <font color="#666666">2 folds</font>, <font color="#CC3333">UTG+2 raises to t210</font>, MP1 calls t210, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, MP3 calls t210, <font color="#666666">2 folds</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises to t1200</font> |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Party $55: Level 2, JJ after LAG raiser and callers.
Definitely push PF. Why agonize over an A, K or Q on the board OOP?
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Party $55: Level 2, JJ after LAG raiser and callers.
Yes, I know I should have pushed preflop, but wondering if pushing JJ is standard here. Would you push anything lower?
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Party $55: Level 2, JJ after LAG raiser and callers.
Yes, JJ is standard. No, I wouldn't push anything lower
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Party $55: Level 2, JJ after LAG raiser and callers.
I push TT+, AK.
But I don't know if this is the correct range, mabey I should push wider: 88+, AQ+ ?? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Party $55: Level 2, JJ after LAG raiser and callers.
[ QUOTE ]
I push TT+, AK. But I don't know if this is the correct range, mabey I should push wider: 88+, AQ+ ?? [/ QUOTE ] No, you shouldn't. Why push TT even? It's not that good. AQs is a maybe but TT no way. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Party $55: Level 2, JJ after LAG raiser and callers.
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I push TT+, AK. But I don't know if this is the correct range, mabey I should push wider: 88+, AQ+ ?? [/ QUOTE ] No, you shouldn't. Why push TT even? It's not that good. AQs is a maybe but TT no way. [/ QUOTE ] Hum? I think I push TT here. We have to believe we're ahead/at least flipping with a lag raiser and some weak callers here and there's a decent pot to be taken down. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Party $55: Level 2, JJ after LAG raiser and callers.
Pushing is pretty standard here because of a LAG opener and it's clear that two cold-callers are not very extatic about their hands either. But JJ is at the very bottom of my range.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Party $55: Level 2, JJ after LAG raiser and callers.
I either push or fold this preflop. With your reads I push.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Party $55: Level 2, JJ after LAG raiser and callers.
I might just flat call here and set mine. Looks like a good spot for set mining. LAG may not call a shove PF but is likely to stack off if gets a piece of the flop.
|
|
|