|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Party vs. FTP - is PP really softer taking rakeback into account?
I'm not sure if this is the right forum, but I am asking this question in regards to small stakes NL (100NL-200NL).
First of all, I play on FTP, however I do have the option to play on PP, living in Canada. To those who play on PP and have played on FTP in the past: I constantly hear how soft Party is. In your opinion, taking FTP's 27% rakeback into account, is it so soft on PP that it makes it more profitable to play there? Essentially, what is better: The soft "factor" of PP or FTP + Rakeback. (In regards to 100NL and 200NL - any additional opinions up to 400NL would be great as well) Thanks. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Party vs. FTP - is PP really softer taking rakeback into account?
I've been told many times over to get some money over to PP. However I'm lazy and RB is easy.
I'll try it out and let you know. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Party vs. FTP - is PP really softer taking rakeback into account?
Yes, No, go find out yourself.
|
|
|