|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Pokertracker: Autorate Rules? (FAQ Link Invalid)
The FAQ Autorate rules link is dead and I've searched the forums several times for "Auto Rate rules for Poker Tracker" and similar terms, but keep getting irrelevant results.
Can someone point me to a good thread? Thank You! |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Pokertracker: Autorate Rules? (FAQ Link Invalid)
I think you should look for them either on the 2+2 software board or google it. There you'll find some rules.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Pokertracker: Autorate Rules? (FAQ Link Invalid)
As a side note, it is better if you learn to go by the numbers VP$IP, PFR%, AF, etc. because it gives you a better feeling about them, those auto rate rules are guidelines, since a TAG with 5/5/20 stats, is different compared to a TAG 21/18/4 stats.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Pokertracker: Autorate Rules? (FAQ Link Invalid)
[ QUOTE ]
As a side note, it is better if you learn to go by the numbers VP$IP, PFR%, AF, etc. because it gives you a better feeling about them, those auto rate rules are guidelines, since a TAG with 5/5/20 stats, is different compared to a TAG 21/18/4 stats. [/ QUOTE ] Completely agreed. You need to learn what these numbers represent. It'll help your game much more than going by autorate rules. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Pokertracker: Autorate Rules? (FAQ Link Invalid)
Agreed on both but it doesn't hurt to have pretty pictures.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Pokertracker: Autorate Rules? (FAQ Link Invalid)
[ QUOTE ]
As a side note, it is better if you learn to go by the numbers VP$IP, PFR%, AF, etc. because it gives you a better feeling about them, those auto rate rules are guidelines, since a TAG with 5/5/20 stats, is different compared to a TAG 21/18/4 stats. [/ QUOTE ] Very true. What I like with the BTP link I gave is that there is a decent article alongside it explaing the various stats in detail with interpretations, etc . Very nice post |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Pokertracker: Autorate Rules? (FAQ Link Invalid)
Thanks guys, I've been using PT without autorate rules for over two years now...just wanted the "pretty picture".
I'll take a look at the article rj; It looks like it has a lot of stuff I'd like to get opinions on. Thanks Again! |
|
|