Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Sporting Events
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: lol
partys_over 30 38.46%
lol_bannaments 7 8.97%
oBBViousbluff 5 6.41%
lol_angleshotU 2 2.56%
kittenkiller 14 17.95%
fuck frist, oot, and/or OP 20 25.64%
Voters: 78. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-02-2007, 09:13 PM
Green Kool Aid Green Kool Aid is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: i ain\'t got my taco
Posts: 6,518
Default Too many football/baseball threads: NBA HYPOTHETICAL TIME

I will explain more, just wanted to know what you guys thought was a better base to build a team around:
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-02-2007, 09:22 PM
TheRedRocket TheRedRocket is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 313
Default Re: Too many football/baseball threads: NBA HYPOTHETICAL TIME

it's really tough because of durant/oden most likely being the best player out of all four but I went with Jefferson & #5 because it gives a shot of having 2 good to great players to build around
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-02-2007, 09:27 PM
Green Kool Aid Green Kool Aid is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: i ain\'t got my taco
Posts: 6,518
Default Re: Too many football/baseball threads: NBA HYPOTHETICAL TIME

[ QUOTE ]
it's really tough because of durant/oden most likely being the best player out of all four but I went with Jefferson & #5 because it gives a shot of having 2 good to great players to build around

[/ QUOTE ]

Do you really think that Jeff Green is gonna be great? I project him as a Danny Granger type player, maybe maxing out as a versatile 16 points, 5 rebound, 2 assist type player.

The thought was this...

The number 1 pick (as an asset) >> Jefferson, and on the flip side, Perkins would not have slipped out of the lottery had he been projected into the draft. I think the two duos are pretty similar in value.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-02-2007, 09:35 PM
TheRedRocket TheRedRocket is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 313
Default Re: Too many football/baseball threads: NBA HYPOTHETICAL TIME

well I thought it was anyone player still available with the #5 pick not just jeff green but still now I am changing my mind because of not wanting to lose out on Durant who is projected to be much much better than anyone else in the scenario.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-02-2007, 09:40 PM
Green Kool Aid Green Kool Aid is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: i ain\'t got my taco
Posts: 6,518
Default Re: Too many football/baseball threads: NBA HYPOTHETICAL TIME

[ QUOTE ]
well I thought it was anyone player still available with the #5 pick not just jeff green but still now I am changing my mind because of not wanting to lose out on Durant who is projected to be much much better than anyone else in the scenario.

[/ QUOTE ]

jeff green or yi or corey brewer or brandan wright or joakim noah. i don't see any of those guys being great.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-02-2007, 09:46 PM
FlyWf FlyWf is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Brian Coming imo
Posts: 3,237
Default Re: Too many football/baseball threads: NBA HYPOTHETICAL TIME

You only get to start 5 players at a time, and only one can have the ball. I'm a massive Jefferson fan, but he's not on Oden's level.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-02-2007, 09:56 PM
Green Kool Aid Green Kool Aid is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: i ain\'t got my taco
Posts: 6,518
Default Re: Too many football/baseball threads: NBA HYPOTHETICAL TIME

My point was that if Perk and the number 1 have more value,

Instead of trading

Delonte West
Wally Sczcerbiak
5th pick
Al Jefferson
Ryan Gomes
Gerald Green
Sebastian Telfair
Theo Ratliff
Two future picks

for

Kevin Garnett
Ray Allen

The Celtics traded

Delonte West
Wally Sczcerbiak
1st pick
Kendrick Perkins
Ryan Gomes
Gerald Green
Sebastian Telfair
Theo Ratliff
Two future picks

for

Kevin Garnett
Ray Allen
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-02-2007, 09:33 PM
vixticator vixticator is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,639
Default Re: Too many football/baseball threads: NBA HYPOTHETICAL TIME

I'd go with #1 pick in a totally random draft year by a lot. Al Jefferson is probably not an all-time great player. With the first pick you have the chance to really become a dynasty, or have more high picks.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-03-2007, 01:02 AM
kidcolin kidcolin is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: get yo fishin right
Posts: 9,576
Default Re: Too many football/baseball threads: NBA HYPOTHETICAL TIME

[ QUOTE ]
I'd go with #1 pick in a totally random draft year by a lot. Al Jefferson is probably not an all-time great player. With the first pick you have the chance to really become a dynasty, or have more high picks.

[/ QUOTE ]

hmm.. this might be close. I wouldn't say "by a lot".

Let's take a look at the top of the draft for the last 10 years. I'm going to list the first pick, and guys near the top who were potential top picks (i.e. teams screw up).

'07 - Oden, Durant
'06 - Bargnani, Aldridge
'05 - Bogut, Deron, Paul (I have a hard time listing Deron and Paul, because I don't know how many teams would "blow" the first pick on them)
'04 - Dwight Howard
'03 - LBJ
'02 - Yao
'01 - Kwame, Pau
'00 - K-Mart (worst. draft. ever)
'99 - Brand
'98 - Kandi, Bibby, Vince
'97 - Timmah

Having the first pick in the '97, '02, '03, and '07 is hands down better than having Jefferson. '04 is closer, and '99 is a little closer than that. The rest I take Al.

In this particular draft, #1 + Kendrick has more value. But it could be close. Al's only 22, btw.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-03-2007, 01:16 AM
vixticator vixticator is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,639
Default Re: Too many football/baseball threads: NBA HYPOTHETICAL TIME

[ QUOTE ]
hmm.. this might be close. I wouldn't say "by a lot".

[/ QUOTE ]Right, there is a good chance you will still end up a terrible team and back to lotto for years. If at least 20% chance of hitting an absolute monster in draft I would have to go with it. Some players instantly restore, or grant, your franchise status. Not counting that you still end up with a quality, all-star player a reasonable amount of the time at level of a Jefferson or higher. Probably more than half or close. When you busto and grab a Kwame or whatever, well, your screwed, but picking at top you likely were to begin with and could get another shot soon--Orlando is huge luckbox for example.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.