Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Micro Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-02-2007, 06:39 PM
 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,809
Default Small straight vs possible bigger straight ?

villain is 30/2/0.9 over 70 hands. I`m 16/8/2.4.

PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em, $0.50 BB (6 handed) Hand History Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com (Format: 2+2 Forums)

saw flop|<font color="#C00000">saw showdown</font>

SB ($57.40)
BB ($10.75)
UTG ($66.25)
MP ($24.25)
Hero ($70.20)
Button ($25.60)

Preflop: Hero is CO with 6[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], 7[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img].
<font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, MP calls $0.50, Hero calls $0.50, <font color="#666666">2 folds</font>, BB checks.

Flop: ($1.75) 8[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], 9[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], 5[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font>
BB checks, <font color="#CC3333">MP bets $0.5</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises to $3</font>, BB folds, MP calls $2.50.

Turn: ($7.75) Q[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
MP checks, <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets $7.5</font>, MP calls $7.50.

River: ($22.75) J[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
<font color="#CC3333">MP bets $13.25 (All-In)</font>

Hero ??
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-02-2007, 06:41 PM
 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,809
Default Re: Small straight vs possible bigger straight ?

I think he either had JT or T7 here. If he would have a set he would have reraised my flop bet IMO.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-02-2007, 06:59 PM
shoxbb6 shoxbb6 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,445
Default Re: Small straight vs possible bigger straight ?

Preflop is meh, otherwise this is standard.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-02-2007, 07:49 PM
Spurious Spurious is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,575
Default Re: Small straight vs possible bigger straight ?

I think it is standard all the way.
The odds you get on the river are too good to fold.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-02-2007, 08:18 PM
orig!naL orig!naL is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: grinding 25nl
Posts: 329
Default Re: Small straight vs possible bigger straight ?

If you agree villain probably raises a flopped set, then the only holding he could have that we beat is 2 pair or a busted draw. 0.9 AF? I really think this is JT or a busted flush draw. Given his PFR %, this could possibly be JJ, but I reaaaaally doubt it.

Top 2% looks like: AA-QQ + AK or AA-JJ

If we take him off all of those holdings, what is he sticking around on this flop for with 0.9 AF?

JT = yes
flush draw = yes
89 = yes (again doubtful, I think he bets out on the flop or shoves to your reraise)
QJ = he probably folds on the flop, but there is a slight chance he called with the gutshot
TT = yes (but would he check it on the flop? I doubt it)

Board: 8h 9h Qs Jc 5s
Dead:

equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 58.140% 58.14% 00.00% 25 0.00 { 7c6c }
Hand 1: 41.860% 41.86% 00.00% 18 0.00 { TT, 8c8d, 8c8s, 8d8s, 5c5d, 5c5h, 5d5h, QJs, JTs, 98s, 6h5h, QJo, JTo, 98o }

fire away! [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] For some reason I actually thought this would be a bad call, but hey look at that.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-02-2007, 08:22 PM
Spurious Spurious is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,575
Default Re: Small straight vs possible bigger straight ?

I think he wouldnt laydown QJ on the flop.

I think we all agree that it is pretty much standard.
But please post the results, i am curious now [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-02-2007, 10:03 PM
Brian O'Nolan Brian O'Nolan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 484
Default Re: Small straight vs possible bigger straight ?

If you think this is an automatic raise pf you need to take another look at stack sizes and your game. Previous limper has 50 BB's as does button. Against most villains as described overlimping is fine and probably optimal here. I call river.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-02-2007, 10:48 PM
shoxbb6 shoxbb6 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,445
Default Re: Small straight vs possible bigger straight ?

[ QUOTE ]
If you think this is an automatic raise pf you need to take another look at stack sizes and your game. Previous limper has 50 BB's as does button. Against most villains as described overlimping is fine and probably optimal here. I call river.

[/ QUOTE ]
Someone with 50bbs who limps isn't good, you can rape them if they call by cbetting nearly 100% of the time. In this specific hand, raising is still better than limping along.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-03-2007, 12:23 AM
Kasane Kasane is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 906
Default Re: Small straight vs possible bigger straight ?

Raising limpers is optimal if they have 100bbs though, and limping behind isn't -EV, it's just not as positive -- at some point they cross, and raising shorty limpers becomes sub-optimal and a limp behind becomes better. Even flat out folding could be better depending on other table dynamics.

It's a very good question at where the graphs on these would cross, where they'd be equal in positive expectation. My guess is somewhere in the 25-40bb range (flop bet has got to have some fold equity, which means villain needs significant money to lose on the turn, among other factors), so not raising limpers with hands like these isn't bad at all.

Push it the other way, if villain had 10bb and limps, we're not raising -- we're folding.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-03-2007, 12:43 AM
Brian O'Nolan Brian O'Nolan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 484
Default Re: Small straight vs possible bigger straight ?

[ QUOTE ]
Someone with 50bbs who limps isn't good, you can rape them if they call by cbetting nearly 100% of the time. In this specific hand, raising is still better than limping along.

[/ QUOTE ]
You are right, a 50 bb limper is probably not good. But they will tend to have stationy tendencies and cbetting 100% of flops is lighting $ on fire. If it was a 12/6 limper would you autoraise pf and auto cbet? Try to think a little beyond "villain = bad and I will raise any playable hand and cbet any flop regardless of texture and I win the monies"
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:21 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.