![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
King Yao's season win article inspired this attempt at creating a season win total for the college football season. However, instead of using my daft handicapping abilities to create power rankings I decided to use the market values for known games to generate rankings and then use those rankings to simulate the entire college football season.
There were a number of simplifications that went into the model and several unknowns that had to be taken into account. For example, all the the I-AA teams were assumed to be huge underdogs (52 points on a neutral field against USC) to most of the I-A teams. Additionally, some of the power rankings for the smaller division I-A schools had to be fudged (like Rice, San Diego State, et al). Therefore if you have reason to believe that this years Weber State team is destined for college football greatness you should back off the numbers that are given against their opponents. In any case, since the results are fairly lengthy I'll just provide the results for some of the more popular teams, and if you're curious about any others I'll post them later. The predicted spread is given in parentheses. Notre Dame Season Wins: 6.44 Georgia Tech (-2.5) 0.551 @Penn St (8.5) 0.269 @Michigan (12.0) 0.22 Michigan St (-7.5) 0.698 @Purdue (4.0) 0.391 @UCLA (9.5) 0.266 Boston College (-1.5) 0.566 USC (12.0) 0.22 Navy (-14.0) 0.822 Air Force (-9.0) 0.718 Duke (-28.0) 0.985 @Stanford (-9.5) 0.734 USC Season Wins: 10.238 Idaho (-43.0) 0.99 @Nebraska (-11.0) 0.765 Washington St (-31.5) 0.99 @Washington (-25.5) 0.985 Stanford (-30.5) 0.99 Arizona (-18.5) 0.904 @Notre Dame (-12.0) 0.78 @Oregon (-11.0) 0.765 Oregon St (-14.5) 0.83 @California (-7.0) 0.69 @Arizona St (-11.5) 0.775 UCLA (-11.5) 0.775 Texas Season Wins: 9.703 Arkansas St (-37.0) 0.99 TCU (-17.0) 0.872 @Central Florida (-12.5) 0.804 Rice (-27.0) 0.985 Kansas St (-17.5) 0.882 Oklahoma (0.0) 0.500 @Iowa St (-18.5) 0.904 @Baylor (-29.0) 0.985 Nebraska (-11.0) 0.765 @Oklahoma St (-3.5) 0.6 Texas Tech (-15.0) 0.832 @Texas A&M (-3.0) 0.584 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
how are you converting spreads into moneylines/win pcts?
They don't correspond from college to pro. They are also heavily dependent on the expected total. market values at the beginning of the season are not the greatest estimate for power rankings power rankings ignore individual matchups and schemes which matter quite a bit in a systems based game like football ummm...how are you factoring in home field? some home fields are worth more home fields matter more when teams are near even or when the home team is slightly worse I also use something similar for teams more important though is to look at the possible dispersion of win totals... the mean is not the most relevant for many of these types of bets |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
also...some of those .99s should be higher than that
we looked into how well 26 point+ favorites did a few times last season over the past decade or so....it's higher than .99 ... in addition, this year will be better for the big favorites due to changes in the rules/game structures... some of those games should just be 1.00s |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't want to seem critical
this is great work that you've put up...one of the best first two posts ever I just want to know how you are getting spreads and converting those into win pcts |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
also...some of those .99s should be higher than that we looked into how well 26 point+ favorites did a few times last season over the past decade or so....it's higher than .99 ... in addition, this year will be better for the big favorites due to changes in the rules/game structures... some of those games should just be 1.00s [/ QUOTE ] quoted for making me look ridiculously stupid also, the Big11Ten has lost all claims to being an elite conference |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think your criticisms are very accurate and important. One of the first things they teach you in college it that truth comes through argument so I'll try to respond to some of the points that you brought up.
The spread-to-moneyline conversions are based roughly on the Pinny conversion numbers from last year. They are not perfectly fit, I didn't create a table, I just created a function that estimated the moneyline based on several known data points. You're probably right that some of the percentages should be greater than .99 for extremely high spreads. The important thing to realize is that going from .99 to .999 will probably not affect the season win totals in any important way. For home field, I just used a 3 point home team advantage. I think the number should actually be a bit higher than that if I remember correctly (closer to 4) - I did that work last year but forgot what the actual number was. An additional point is that some of the neutral site games were not accurately adjusted for, only the OU/Texas UCLA/USC games were taken into account - so inaccuracies may have been introduced there as well. I decided to use the market values to adjust the spreads simply due to the fact that there are so many teams in college football - most of which I know nothing about. I completely agree with your point that certain types of matchups will exaggerate point spreads and that this model does not take that into account. I tend to disagree about the mean being an accurate way to predict totals, this really goes back to King Yao's work and I think he did an excellent job arguing the merits of the system. In any case, after posting the Syracuse totals yesterday I realized that there was a bug in my graph traversal algorithm, and I had to make some minor adjustments to my code. This change affected all the posted totals (the Syracuse one more than any others), so I'll repost the new results. USC Season Wins: 10.447 Idaho (-43.0) 0.99 @Nebraska (-10.0) 0.746 Washington St (-22.0) 0.949 @Washington (-29.5) 0.985 Stanford (-31.5) 0.99 Arizona (-20.0) 0.914 @Notre Dame (-12.0) 0.78 @Oregon (-12.5) 0.804 Oregon St (-21.0) 0.939 @California (-8.5) 0.731 @Arizona St (-11.5) 0.775 UCLA (-16.0) 0.845 Notre Dame Season Wins: 6.475 Georgia Tech (-3.0) 0.584 @Penn St (8.0) 0.293 @Michigan (11.0) 0.235 Michigan St (-7.5) 0.698 @Purdue (4.0) 0.391 @UCLA (9.5) 0.266 Boston College (-2.0) 0.528 USC (12.0) 0.22 Navy (-14.0) 0.822 Air Force (-9.0) 0.718 Duke (-28.0) 0.985 @Stanford (-9.5) 0.734 Texas Season Wins: 9.807 Arkansas St (-37.0) 0.99 TCU (-17.0) 0.872 @Central Florida (-12.5) 0.804 Rice (-26.0) 0.985 Kansas St (-21.5) 0.95 Oklahoma (-0.0) 0.500 @Iowa St (-18.0) 0.888 @Baylor (-29.0) 0.985 Nebraska (-9.0) 0.718 @Oklahoma St (-7.5) 0.698 Texas Tech (-15.0) 0.832 @Texas A&M (-3.0) 0.584 |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Heres how some of the perennial SEC powers are expected to perform:
Florida Season Wins: 8.605 Western Kentucky (-28.5) 0.985 Troy (-34.0) 0.99 Tennessee (-6.0) 0.646 @Mississippi (-12.5) 0.804 Auburn (-7.0) 0.69 @LSU (7.0) 0.31 @Kentucky (-3.0) 0.584 @Georgia (2.0) 0.472 Vanderbilt (-20.5) 0.923 @South Carolina (-3.0) 0.584 Florida Atlantic (-36.0) 0.99 Florida St (-5.0) 0.626 Arkansas Season Wins: 8.084 Troy (-26.0) 0.985 @Alabama (2.0) 0.472 Kentucky (-3.0) 0.584 North Texas (-32.5) 0.99 Chattanooga (-37.5) 0.99 Auburn (1.0) 0.488 @Mississippi (-6.5) 0.661 Florida International (-36.5) 0.99 South Carolina (-3.0) 0.584 @Tennessee (6.0) 0.354 Mississippi St (-12.0) 0.78 @LSU (13.0) 0.206 Georgia Season Wins: 8.416 Oklahoma St (-7.0) 0.69 South Carolina (-8.0) 0.707 Western Carolina (-41.0) 0.99 @Alabama (-2.0) 0.528 Mississippi (-17.5) 0.882 @Tennessee (2.5) 0.449 @Vanderbilt (-12.0) 0.78 Florida (-2.0) 0.528 Troy (-30.0) 0.99 Auburn (-5.0) 0.626 Kentucky (-6.5) 0.661 @Georgia Tech (-3.0) 0.584 LSU Season Wins: 9.721 @Mississippi St (-16.0) 0.845 Virginia Tech (-7.0) 0.69 Middle Tenn State (-43.0) 0.99 South Carolina (-13.0) 0.794 @Tulane (-28.5) 0.985 Florida (-7.0) 0.69 @Kentucky (-7.0) 0.69 Auburn (-10.0) 0.746 @Alabama (-6.0) 0.646 Louisiana Tech (-32.5) 0.99 @Mississippi (-16.5) 0.861 Arkansas (-13.0) 0.794 Auburn Season Wins: 7.903 Kansas St (-13.0) 0.794 South Florida (-2.5) 0.551 Mississippi St (-15.0) 0.832 New Mexico State (-23.5) 0.972 @Florida (7.0) 0.31 Vanderbilt (-15.5) 0.859 @Arkansas (-1.0) 0.512 @LSU (10.0) 0.254 Mississippi (-14.5) 0.83 Tennessee Tech (-38.5) 0.99 @Georgia (5.0) 0.374 Alabama (-5.0) 0.626 Tennessee Season Wins: 8.063 @California (4.0) 0.391 Southern Miss (-17.5) 0.882 @Florida (6.0) 0.354 Arkansas St (-31.5) 0.99 Georgia (-2.5) 0.551 @Mississippi St (-9.0) 0.718 @Alabama (-1.0) 0.512 South Carolina (-6.0) 0.646 Louisiana-Lafayette (-32.5) 0.99 Arkansas (-6.0) 0.646 Vanderbilt (-17.5) 0.882 @Kentucky (-0.0) 0.5 |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
You're probably right that some of the percentages should be greater than .99 for extremely high spreads. The important thing to realize is that going from .99 to .999 will probably not affect the season win totals in any important way. [/ QUOTE ] They should just be 1. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Nice... I love the idea of these bets, but I've always hated tying my money up for the entire year. I only take one when I think I've got a huge edge.
Where did you get the lines for these games? A lot of them are on GOTYs but did you just guess at the rest or is there somewhere that lists every single game as a GOTY? I don't mind the spread to moneyline conversion like a couple of other guys did, I think that fussing about it is worrying about rounding a rough estimate to three decimal places. Let me congratulate you - these are some pretty sharp measurements, you must be pretty close to what the houses are using. going with the 5dimes and greek lines: Notre Dame under 7.5 at -150 (greek) is the only one that differs by more than 1.0 games, and even then has a ton of juice with it. florida under 9.5 at -155 (dimes) or under 10 at -320 (greek) and Tennessee under 9 -140 (greek) are off by almost a game, but again have 40-50 points of juice. LSU and Auburn are off by a bit but again, the juice evens it out. Can you do a computation for Cal? Just for my curiosity? I want to see how biased I am... these were numbers that I estimated and pulled out of my ass: 09/01 Tennessee .61 09/08 at Colo St .86 09/15 La Tech 6:30 .98 09/22 Arizona TBD .79 09/29 at Oregon .50 10/13 Oregon St .76 10/20 at UCLA .55 10/27 at Arizona St .58 11/03 Wash St .85 11/10 USC .39 11/17 at Washington .66 12/01 at Stanford .91 8.44 wins. (although honestly I think I am selling us short on a few of those games) |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Also, can you do:
Oregon (over 7 -105) Pittsburgh (over 6.5 +125) WVU (over 10.5 +120) Arizona State (over 7.5 -110) Arizona (over 6.5 -130) Thanks man |
![]() |
|
|