Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Poker > Stud
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-28-2007, 12:52 PM
HOWMANY HOWMANY is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,322
Default That\'s a shame, I wanted to creep in there cheaply 30 E

The K door card is likely either retarded or rolled up. Cards are surprisingly live, but I really hate this type of hand when the pot gets big on early streets. Should I still try to slither in or should I just avoid the headache that can ensue here? A[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] is a reasonable player so his limp here is somewhat perplexing and he could quite likely have started better 3 flush than me already.

7 Card Stud High-Low ($30/$60), Ante $5, Bring-In $10 (converter)

3rd Street - (1.17 SB)

Seat 1: xx xx 2[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]___brings-in
Seat 2: xx xx 6[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]___calls
Seat 4: xx xx 6[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]___folds
Seat 5: xx xx 4[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]___folds
Seat 6: xx xx A[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]___calls___calls
Seat 7: xx xx K[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]___raises
Hero: T[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] J[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 9[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-28-2007, 01:23 PM
Andy B Andy B is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Blowing 0.0%
Posts: 9,170
Default Re: That\'s a shame, I wanted to creep in there cheaply 30 E

My quick Bayesian analysis reveals that it is about 17 times more likely that the King is clueless than it is that he is rolled-up. You're probably looking at a weakish three-card low (or something worse) and split Kings. Your hand is pretty live, and it's relatively cheap. I call here and like it.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-28-2007, 03:12 PM
PokerJans PokerJans is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 399
Default Re: That\'s a shame, I wanted to creep in there cheaply 30 E

Don't pick at scabs unless you want a scar!

The playability of hands like this is just terrible if one of the other lows starts catching gooood and you catch a 'good' card like an offsuit Q or something.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-28-2007, 03:16 PM
HOWMANY HOWMANY is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,322
Default Re: That\'s a shame, I wanted to creep in there cheaply 30 E

[ QUOTE ]
Don't pick at scabs unless you want a scar!

The playability of hands like this is just terrible if one of the other lows starts catching gooood and you catch a 'good' card like an offsuit Q or something.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes, this is my biggest fear with these sort of hands. I always wonder if I'm missing something when I throw them away time after time, but so often when I get involved with them I find myself picking up just enough that I think I need to keep going and by 7th street I've put in god knows how many bets with a hand that I didn't even want to play in the first place.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-03-2007, 06:22 AM
RandomUser RandomUser is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 678
Default Re: That\'s a shame, I wanted to creep in there cheaply 30 E

I definitely fold this as well. You are trying to catch two cards to win half the pot.

I don't see why the K has to be clueless, wouldn't you raise split K here after the A merely called?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-04-2007, 01:34 AM
Andy B Andy B is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Blowing 0.0%
Posts: 9,170
Default Re: That\'s a shame, I wanted to creep in there cheaply 30 E

With a big pair, you really want a heads-up pot, preferably against a weaker high hand. There are already two limpers, and there's no reason that the bring-in can't have a hand, so it's very unlikely that you'll get it heads-up. The only people behind him are a Nine and the bring-in. The Nine's going to be folding most of the time anyway, and if the bring-in is going to fold to his raise on third, he'll probably fold to a bet on fourth anyway. So his raise isn't going to knock out much of anyone, and he's not looking to build a pot against two or more low hands. I'd limp in with the Kings and hope everyone catches bananas on fourth.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-02-2007, 01:38 PM
SweetLuckyMe SweetLuckyMe is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 656
Default Re: That\'s a shame, I wanted to creep in there cheaply 30 E

That's one of the easiest folds of the year. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-02-2007, 02:09 PM
SuitedBaby SuitedBaby is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Great Poker Desert North Coast
Posts: 143
Default Re: That\'s a shame, I wanted to creep in there cheaply 30 E

[ QUOTE ]
That's one of the easiest folds of the year. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

This is exactly how I see it.

Patty
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-04-2007, 08:46 AM
Jackal69 Jackal69 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: gg shortstackers!
Posts: 732
Default Re: That\'s a shame, I wanted to creep in there cheaply 30 E

[ QUOTE ]
That's one of the easiest folds of the year. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

ya you are going to catch half good, or get jammed later, or get only half way too often here...
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-03-2007, 12:49 PM
mscags mscags is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Valencia Spain
Posts: 3,084
Default Re: That\'s a shame, I wanted to creep in there cheaply 30 E

I dont think there is anything wrong with it, you have a good speculative hand that would like to see a card.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.