Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-24-2007, 05:14 AM
FinalPot FinalPot is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 143
Default nl 200 - 88

PokerStars 200 NL Hold'em <font color="#0000FF">(5 handed)</font> HandRecorder v0.9b

Stacks &amp; Stats
BU ($252.55) (29/10/0.50/45) (107h)
SB ($229)
CO ($200)
MP ($231.80)
Hero ($291.05)

Preflop: Hero is BB with 8[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], 8[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]
<font color="#666666">1 folds</font>, CO (poster) checks, <font color="#FF0000">BU raises to $10</font>, <font color="#666666">1 folds</font>, Hero calls $8, <font color="#666666">1 folds</font>.

Flop: ($21) T[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], 7[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], 9[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
Hero checks, <font color="#FF0000">BU bets $20</font>, <font color="#FF0000">Hero raises to $281.05 (All-In)</font>, BU calls $222.55 (All-In).

Turn: ($544.60) Q[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players, 2 all-in)</font>


River: ($544.60) 3[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players, 2 all-in)</font>


Final Pot: $544.60.


3bettet him preflop 2 times in a row before, thats why i called this time
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-24-2007, 05:16 AM
HiBaCHi HiBaCHi is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 363
Default Re: nl 200 - 88

why not just c/r to 80 and play for stacks from there?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-24-2007, 05:17 AM
mused01 mused01 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 312
Default Re: nl 200 - 88

[ QUOTE ]
why not just c/r to 80 and play for stacks from there?

[/ QUOTE ]
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-24-2007, 05:41 AM
FinalPot FinalPot is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 143
Default Re: nl 200 - 88

thought the fold equity is higher then
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-24-2007, 06:19 AM
kindju kindju is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 171
Default Re: nl 200 - 88

I don't like your line. It's pretty obvious and we don't fare well against villain's calling range. When called you probably have only 6 outs and with such a big overshove you prolly need villain to fold at least 70% to break even (someone could look this up). Once villain pots the flop I doubt you have enough fold equity especially since you've been 3-betting him a lot and because he's very passive. Your draw looks hot but it's really not that good (the idiot end of a straigth and a 8 high flush...).
Leading this flop is way better because villain is passive. You will get value from Asx kind of hand and will only get raised by hand against which you have a better equity when you 3-bet shove. That's because villain is more likely to just call hands that have a flush or straigth potential and raise only hands that fear a fourth spade or four straight.

I don't like a c/r to 80 because he will flat call a vast majority and will be in a sick spot.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-24-2007, 06:40 AM
mythrilfox mythrilfox is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: i ain\'t got my taco
Posts: 1,428
Default Re: nl 200 - 88

i definitely prefer leading but this is fine. you aren't called hardly ever but if you are you have 34% equity against overpair + spade, 60% against just a straight overpair, or 44% against a set. a lot of players will fold JsJx/QsQx to your raise too.

also when he pots flop he prob doesnt have a made flush which is obv your worst case scenario. most people arent potting here with a made a/k/q high flush.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.