|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Sklansky hurting?
Gave a speech in exchange for a STAKE in the 50k horse and main event
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Sklansky hurting?
Why would that mean he's hurting? What sort of speech was this, some hour long thing for some college somewhere? Who wouldn't make that trade, rich or not.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Sklansky hurting?
cause a, he needs a stake in the first place and b, he gave a speech just for the oppurtunity to be staked not in exchange for any compensation
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Sklansky hurting?
A speech for 50k is pretty good hourly.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Sklansky hurting?
do you not see how his acceptance of the offer does not imply that he couldn't enter the event w/o it? also, how is a 50k stake no compensation. nyu admissions must be slacking. j/k
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Sklansky hurting?
[ QUOTE ]
do you not see how his acceptance of the offer does not imply that he couldn't enter the event w/o it? also, how is a 50k stake no compensation. nyu admissions must be slacking. j/k [/ QUOTE ] It depends entirely on the percentage he got in his stake. If he accepted a 1-99 split in return for a speech, he probably wouldn't take it. Maybe DS will enlighten us someday on what the break-even point for N is between A> take the stake where DS pays nothing and gets N% of the gross and B> DS BRing himself. My guess is that for DS, N=15. Meanwhile, I would take a 50k stake in the HORSE event for a 0-100 split. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Sklansky hurting?
[ QUOTE ]
Meanwhile, I would take a 50k stake in the HORSE event for a 0-100 split. [/ QUOTE ] That would be extremely -EU (not EV) due to the possibiity of you "winning" millions of dollars. Do you see why? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Sklansky hurting?
[ QUOTE ]
Gave a speech in exchange for a STAKE in the 50k horse and main event [/ QUOTE ] I cant think of a single professional player in the world who wouldn't give a speech in exchange for a 50k stake in the HORSE event. Can you really imagine David asking himself "I could pull 50k out of my pocket or spend 2 hours giving a speech, I better pay for the entry on my own so nobody finds out". Thats a ridiculous thing to assume, David knows a +EV situation when he sees it. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Sklansky hurting? *DELETED*
Post deleted by antisocialgrace
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Sklansky hurting?
Guys, you're all missing the point, nobody gave DS 50k for a speech, the op is that he was given a stake for a speech. Which is fine by the way, who wouldn't give a speech in order to freeroll in a big horse tournament? I'm assuming the percentage of the win david gets to keep is enough so that this proposition is well into +EV for him.
|
|
|