|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
AKs - a confusing spot on flop
Villain is a lovely 51/4/0.5. How should I be best responding to this flop donk?
Full Tilt No-Limit Hold'em, $1 BB (6 handed) Hand History Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com (Format: 2+2 Forums) CO ($187.25) Hero ($171.60) SB ($130.15) BB ($39) UTG ($100.60) MP ($100) Preflop: Hero is Button with K[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], A[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]. <font color="#666666">2 folds</font>, <font color="#CC3333">CO raises to $3.5</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises to $12</font>, SB calls $11.50, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, CO calls $8.50. Flop: ($37) T[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], 3[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], J[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font> <font color="#CC3333">SB bets $10</font>, CO folds, Hero ??? If I simply call, what is my plan on a turn of Ace or King? A blank turn? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: AKs - a confusing spot on flop
Raising the flop (planning on checking it down) is awesome if he has air or a draw and won't try to bluff you anymore (these guys usually don't). But this plan kind of sucks if he has a real hand as we stick in like $40 drawing slim, and might not even see any cards if he shoves the flop.
Calling doesn't seem too bad. He might give us a free card or bet small again or who knows its only $10. It basically tells him you have AK though (he probably already thinks you have it anyway) and he might price you out on the turn Hrm okay if i call the flop and turn a A or a K I would call the turn ($40 or less) and fold the river. I doubt he would triple barrel a JT3 K 2 or JT3 A 3 board without having AK beat. On a blank turn i would probably call up to $25ish. I would never bet if checked to on the turn. I would bet smallish ($30-40?) if the turn bricked and got checked through and i rivered a pair. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: AKs - a confusing spot on flop
those preflop coldcalls usually mean medium pps. also the fact hes betting into two people means to me we are behind, either to a set or QQ, maybe KK (or less probably AA). I think I would call here to catch a Q or see how he reacts when an A or a K drops. when he leads out strong on an A/K turn, I would consider folding. If he continues weakishly I would call him down.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: AKs - a confusing spot on flop
[ QUOTE ]
those preflop coldcalls usually mean medium pps. also the fact hes betting into two people means to me we are behind, either to a set or QQ, maybe KK (or less probably AA). I think I would call here to catch a Q or see how he reacts when an A or a K drops. when he leads out strong on an A/K turn, I would consider folding. If he continues weakishly I would call him down. [/ QUOTE ] this guy is not exactly brilliant. see: [ QUOTE ] 51/4/0.5 [/ QUOTE ] i doubt we are up against a set here. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: AKs - a confusing spot on flop
Er nevermind what i wrote, if this guy is 51/4 and raise/called preflop I think TT and JJ is a HUGE part of his range. Just try to make a straight cheap, and fold the river even if you make a pair.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: AKs - a confusing spot on flop
okay, I guess I have to adjust his pf range then [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
still I wouldnt raise this type betting into two as you wouldnt even get him off a J. He lets you draw cheaply and you have position. see the turn with him and decide on his action then. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: AKs - a confusing spot on flop
I peel the flop. Folding isn't really an option since we have about 8 outs on average, 4 of them being to the nuts. Most often fold the turn UI.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: AKs - a confusing spot on flop
51/4/0.5 raising PF, calling a 3bet OOP, and then leading a flop into 2 players is a little alarming, I mean his post-flop aggression is 0.5. How reliable are these stats? Have you seen him show down any hands where he has raised PF or called 3bets?
Assuming these stats are accurate I would fold the flop. The guy is a loose passive calling station, and is leading into 2 players on the flop! This line from this player indicates a very strong hand. We may have 10 outs but how many of them are clean/good if we hit. We could potentially lose a lot of money if an A or K hits on the turn. The only card we will love to see on the turn is a Q, and we are not getting the odds to chase a 4 outer. With a different read on villain, I insta-call his small flop bet and re-evaluate on the turn. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: AKs - a confusing spot on flop
[ QUOTE ]
51/4/0.5 raising PF, calling a 3bet OOP, and then leading a flop into 2 players is a little alarming, I mean his post-flop aggression is 0.5. How reliable are these stats? Have you seen him show down any hands where he has raised PF or called 3bets? Assuming these stats are accurate I would fold the flop. The guy is a loose passive calling station, and is leading into 2 players on the flop! This line from this player indicates a very strong hand. We may have 10 outs but how many of them are clean/good if we hit. We could potentially lose a lot of money if an A or K hits on the turn. The only card we will love to see on the turn is a Q, and we are not getting the odds to chase a 4 outer. With a different read on villain, I insta-call his small flop bet and re-evaluate on the turn. [/ QUOTE ] This small bet doesn't mean monster. And we're getting 5:1 with 4 outs to the nuts and $110 behind in a $60 pot vs a donk. Do the math, implied odds if we hit a Q and a chance of an A or K being good (without us going beserk if we hit one) makes this call a no brainer. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: AKs - a confusing spot on flop
[ QUOTE ]
The guy is a loose passive calling station, and is leading into 2 players on the flop! This line from this player indicates a very strong hand. We may have 10 outs but how many of them are clean/good if we hit. We could potentially lose a lot of money if an A or K hits on the turn. The only card we will love to see on the turn is a Q, and we are not getting the odds to chase a 4 outer. [/ QUOTE ] Eh I always says "well if he has a set, then i have the implied odds for the gutshot!" and then i say "and if he doesnt have a set, i have the immediate odds for a pair!". Am i gambling too much thinking about it like this? |
|
|