How are the games?

[the_rookie]

I remember even before pre-legislation the limit games were getting pretty [censored]. (6-max was ok). So how are the games now? What are the average BB/100 nowadays? Are the full ring games just full of nits and TAGs?

[Bona]

2 lags on my right, 2 rocks on my left, 5 fish across the table. How sweet it is. Seriously though, not much different from my point of view.

[Mister Bloom]

Not saying much, but up to 0.10/0.20 on stars seem pretty much the same as always (couple TAGs, couple uber-weak/tights, couple loose fish, and the obligatory maniac).

[Zeldark]

The games are tougher and filled mostly by tough opponents, people that know how to beat tough opponents, and the 1-3ish horrible players that still find a chair at each table. However, it seems like every table has it's share of bad players still too. It's still very beatable though, and fun! [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img] Limits lower than 25/50¢ are still quite soft, imo.

[halpgr]

It seems about the same to me. Why don't you sit down and play some and report your findings for more discussion.

[calidris]

I think it depends a lot on time of day. I moved up from .25/50 to .5/1 on stars some 3000 hands ago and i don't notice any difference in opposition. I find that around 9AM (UTC) to 12 (UTC) the only players at the few .5/1 tables are very tight. Before and after that time it's no different from .25/.50

[Riku]

If i compare .25/.5 and .5/1, the opponents just got tighter but most of them still don't know what they're doing. But then again, neither do i always [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

Btw, is "stupider" a word ? I heard Conan say it, which of course doesn't mean anything. I've always thought it was "more stupid".

[Dilznoofus]

stupider is not a word

[marchron]

[ QUOTE ]
stupider ain't a word

[/ QUOTE ]

[bravos1]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
stupider tisn't a word

[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]