|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Short AI article
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/com...cle2002699.ece
Surely article is wrong and poker is a more difficult game for a computer to win at. Bots can obviously win against bad players and full handed tables but could one ever beat a top pro heads up? I'm guessing that will be done sooner at GO than in poker |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Short AI article
From what I know, Poki is a fairly good program capable of beating most amateurs. I don't think Go programs are at that level yet.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Short AI article
If you can buy in short enough there should be no problem to write a bot along the lines of "The Mathematics of Poker"
I'm also pretty confident that HU can be played somewhat optimally with deep stacks vs. a pro. Go o the other hand, well I wouldn't even know how to start writing the bot :P |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Short AI article
How many combinations does it have to work through and figure out the EV for? That's the end-all question for these game bots.
For Go, it's huge, huge, huge. We're talking about a 19x19 board. Even if you exclude plays that are known bad most of the time we can only drop that to about a 17x17, so you can see that the computer will have a lot to think about for just a few moves ahead. The choice tree of poker, particularly limit poker (but even no-limit once you exclude known-irrational pot sizes), is much, much, much smaller. Bet, raise, fold? And once the community cards come out, the combinations of possible opponents holdings become relatively small, too, because you can generally lump together most kinds of hands that missed the flop. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Short AI article
Surely you underestimate the complexity of Go.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Short AI article
Additionally, for Poker it's relatively easy to calculate your equity at a given point in the hand, and compare that with the pot size and a given bet. You do have to put your opponent on a hand range, but that's something a human can tune for a bot pretty easily.
For go, evaulating a board position isn't so easy. The number of interactions from stone to stone, group to group, are ridiculous. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Short AI article
Computers don't have the STONES to play Go, HAHAHAHAHA.
|
|
|