Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Puzzles and Other Games
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-01-2007, 02:42 AM
HedonismBot HedonismBot is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Grinding up a roll
Posts: 1,504
Default Short AI article

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/com...cle2002699.ece

Surely article is wrong and poker is a more difficult game for a computer to win at. Bots can obviously win against bad players and full handed tables but could one ever beat a top pro heads up? I'm guessing that will be done sooner at GO than in poker
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-01-2007, 03:01 AM
lastchance lastchance is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Don\'t edit my location
Posts: 22,856
Default Re: Short AI article

From what I know, Poki is a fairly good program capable of beating most amateurs. I don't think Go programs are at that level yet.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-01-2007, 03:29 AM
clowntable clowntable is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Lille, France
Posts: 7,076
Default Re: Short AI article

If you can buy in short enough there should be no problem to write a bot along the lines of "The Mathematics of Poker"

I'm also pretty confident that HU can be played somewhat optimally with deep stacks vs. a pro.

Go o the other hand, well I wouldn't even know how to start writing the bot :P
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-01-2007, 09:26 AM
Neil S Neil S is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Southern California
Posts: 10,611
Default Re: Short AI article

How many combinations does it have to work through and figure out the EV for? That's the end-all question for these game bots.

For Go, it's huge, huge, huge. We're talking about a 19x19 board. Even if you exclude plays that are known bad most of the time we can only drop that to about a 17x17, so you can see that the computer will have a lot to think about for just a few moves ahead.

The choice tree of poker, particularly limit poker (but even no-limit once you exclude known-irrational pot sizes), is much, much, much smaller. Bet, raise, fold? And once the community cards come out, the combinations of possible opponents holdings become relatively small, too, because you can generally lump together most kinds of hands that missed the flop.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-01-2007, 09:26 AM
amplify amplify is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Always Already
Posts: 18,027
Default Re: Short AI article

Surely you underestimate the complexity of Go.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-01-2007, 09:28 AM
Neil S Neil S is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Southern California
Posts: 10,611
Default Re: Short AI article

Additionally, for Poker it's relatively easy to calculate your equity at a given point in the hand, and compare that with the pot size and a given bet. You do have to put your opponent on a hand range, but that's something a human can tune for a bot pretty easily.

For go, evaulating a board position isn't so easy. The number of interactions from stone to stone, group to group, are ridiculous.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-01-2007, 09:31 AM
amplify amplify is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Always Already
Posts: 18,027
Default Re: Short AI article

Computers don't have the STONES to play Go, HAHAHAHAHA.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.