|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
NT!
Dear NT,
Being an abusive, but funny, [censored] moderator is the schtick of me and censored. Please find a schtick of your own. I do not think that the current attempt at a style differentiation are trying of abusive, unfunny, and [censored] works so well. Sincerely, citanul PS: The above is mostly a joke. I think that in general you do a pretty good job in OOT, but I think the tone of many of your posts containing moderating decisions misses the mark of being anything other than abusive. I think that if you changed this, you'd take a lot less crap, and both OOT and ATF would be more tolerable forums. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NT!
cit,
i have a hard time not being abusive when i answer the same complaint (about how bad one-sentence posts should be ok and if they are truly bad they will just 'drop down') two or three times a week. i'm actually not trying to be funny at all. anyway i have heard concerns from here and PMs from moderators that i respect a lot, such as yourself, about the tone. i recently started a thread in OOT trying to tease out what people look at as constructive and desirable forum culture, and am going to be using that to move forward re: OOT. i have also tried to take a less heavy hand in OOT in recent days, although you can expect me to continue being really mean to ATF trolls who don't read or understand the OOT sticky. i hope you guys will post in the thread in OOT if you have an opinion |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NT!
also, i'd like to use this thread to ask again if it would be possible to write a script to check on users with low post counts coming into OOT. is the popular idea that everyone coming in gets *d actually accurate? how many of them turn out to be obvious troll accounts? etc. it would be great to be able to say, "x% of posters 'breaking in' to OOT got *d or banned, and of those, y% were spammers or gimmicks." dunno how hard this would be to write.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NT!
i actually even PM'd sniper to see if he was interested in this, in case anyone doubts my willingness to make some changes in OOT [img]/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img]
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NT!
NT,
I think you are a good mod! |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NT!
NT!,
I don't want you to take this the wrong way, because I genuinely like you and think you do a good job. Also, I can't even post in OOT anymore. However, I still read it everyday and that guy in AFT talking about locking threads makes a decent point. All the bad threads arent going to get responses and will just drop off. I'm not saying that the [censored] troll threads shouldn't be locked, but sometimes I've seen threads where I'm interested in the subject but it got locked very quickly. A good example is the batman one...I was pretty interested in it because I know ooters usually come up with good discussion about things I haven't heard yet; that could have been a good thread. Anyways, just some constructive criticism, didn't mean to call you out. -nation |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NT!
[ QUOTE ]
NT, I think you are a mod! [/ QUOTE ] <font color="white">a good one! </font> |
|
|