|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Too Aggressive
Enemy is passive-passive
PokerStars 0.50/1.00 Hold'em (10 handed) Hand History Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com (Format: 2+2 Forums) Preflop: Hero is BB with T[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], Q[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]. <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, UTG+1 calls, <font color="#666666">4 folds</font>, CO calls, <font color="#666666">2 folds</font>, Hero checks. Flop: (3.50 SB) 3[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], 4[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], T[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font> <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets</font>, UTG+1 folds, <font color="#CC3333">CO raises</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Hero 3-bets</font>, CO calls. Turn: (4.75 BB) 9[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font> <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets</font>, CO calls. River: (6.75 BB) 5[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font> <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets</font>, CO calls. Final Pot: 8.75 BB |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Too Aggressive
Depends on how passive is passive and how many worse Ts he limps pf but this is probably fine. Only thing that's even debatable is the flop 3bet.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Too Aggressive
that is what I am asking, should I've 3 betted or went to call mode?
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Too Aggressive
With no read I think as played is fine. With a passive read I'd like to know how loose he is; can he have T7s here? T5s?
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Too Aggressive
This is fine on this board. 2-pairs for Villain on the flop is really rare here.
Here are my factors for whether or not I would choose to 3-bet or not: 1. I'm more likely to 3-bet if there are legitimate flush/straight draws in case he may be C/R that. 2. The board is less likely to have legitimate 2 pair combinations, as in I'm more likely to 3-bet Q43 than QJ7. 3. My kicker, duh. 4. If I am OUT OF POSITION and there is a draw on the board. This is minor, but especially true if I'm in a game where players are willing to raise for a freecard. Basically, I want to avoid bet/calling the flop and watching the turn get checked through. Usually, my line to counter frequent freecard takers is to bet/fold the turn, but I can't do so here, so I would be more likely to 3-bet. Once I have 3-bet and I get raised on the turn, I can usually fold. In this case the passivity of the opponent really works against us. However, I am still betting because his most likely holdings are 99-55 and smaller tens when he raises us. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Too Aggressive
Sounds solid!
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Too Aggressive
I like your line better than a passive one because I dont like giving my opponent the free card option with a hand as vulnerable as this.
It only costs you an extra half bet and if you get raised on the turn or river by a truly passive opponent then you can dump it pretty easily unless you have improved. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Too Aggressive
Solid Man! Looks great to me.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Too Aggressive
[ QUOTE ]
I like your line better than a passive one because I dont like giving my opponent the free card option with a hand as vulnerable as this. [/ QUOTE ] I'm not saying I disilke OP's line as the default, but what limps in UTG1 and then makes a FCP on this board? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Too Aggressive
UTG+1 folded the flop. CO is the villain.
|
|
|