Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-06-2007, 04:53 AM
rakes.a.beach rakes.a.beach is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Abs. Poka @ UCLA
Posts: 1,043
Default 100NL AQ turned TPGK

Absolute Poker
No Limit Holdem Ring game
Blinds: $0.50/$1
6 players
Converter

Stack sizes:
UTG: $102.85
UTG+1: $181.90
CO: $118.70
Button: $215.60
SB: $109.70
Hero: $200

Pre-flop: (6 players) Hero is BB with Q[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] A[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]
2 folds, <font color="#cc0000">CO raises to $4</font>, 2 folds, <font color="#cc0000">Hero raises to $16</font>, CO calls.

Flop: K[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] J[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 4[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] ($32.5, 2 players)
<font color="#cc0000">Hero bets $23</font>, CO calls.

Turn: A[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] ($78.5, 2 players)
Hero ???

Villian just sat down. seems taggish with no other read.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-06-2007, 05:51 AM
kindju kindju is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 171
Default Re: 100NL AQ turned TPGK

First of all I don't think reraising with AQ in the BB is such a good idea if you're not sure that villain will call your reraise with a wide range that comprises smaller Ax and underpairs. If not you've basically turned a good hand into a bluff. If the original raiser has a tight calling range for 3-bet I'd rather reraise him with weaker hands (sc, smaller pairs) that I can't just call with.
Now that he has called you, you will have to play a big pot OOP with a potentially dominated hand...

As played, C-betting the flop is fine, if you think his range is fairly wide but reads are critical imo for that kind of play.
When he calls the flop bet, crai on the turn seems the best play but you've put yourself in a tough spot.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-06-2007, 06:32 AM
rberg rberg is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 512
Default Re: 100NL AQ turned TPGK

pf reraise is good imo.
if you just call, you end up folding most flops with the best hand.
i c/c or c/f depending on much he bets on the turn (the line being maybe around half pot), but i actually expect him to check behind a good percentage of the time.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-06-2007, 06:36 AM
$upermad4it $upermad4it is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Belfast
Posts: 705
Default Re: 100NL AQ turned TPGK

Preflop is good, I check call turn
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-06-2007, 06:59 AM
Tickner Tickner is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,554
Default Re: 100NL AQ turned TPGK

I like it as played, and now on the turn I like to check it and hope he bets. Reasoning is that I dont think he will call a 2nd barell on a scarey turn with a worse hand but will take stabs at it with more. Moreover when we check the turn we look weaker if he checks behind and we bet the river.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-06-2007, 07:35 AM
kindju kindju is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 171
Default Re: 100NL AQ turned TPGK

Everybody seems to think preflop is good. Could someone explain why? I usually 3-bet AQ in that spot but I am starting to reevaluate that play.
I feel that in order for a 3bet to be more ev than a call villain calling range has to be somewhat large. If not he will call with a better hand and you will play a big pot OOP. That can't be good right?
Plus, 3-betting makes him fold his dominated Ax which is not good for us.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-06-2007, 07:47 AM
rberg rberg is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 512
Default Re: 100NL AQ turned TPGK

[ QUOTE ]
Everybody seems to think preflop is good. Could someone explain why? I usually 3-bet AQ in that spot but I am starting to reevaluate that play.
I feel that in order for a 3bet to be more ev than a call villain calling range has to be somewhat large. If not he will call with a better hand and you will play a big pot OOP. That can't be good right?
Plus, 3-betting makes him fold his dominated Ax which is not good for us.

[/ QUOTE ]

i believe there is more value in taking it down pf + taking it down with a c-bet + winning a pot just cause you have best hand compared to getting value only those times you hit and are good.
But i'd love to hear the opinion of better players on this!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-06-2007, 12:57 PM
wrkingtobegreat wrkingtobegreat is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: changing
Posts: 1,008
Default Re: 100NL AQ turned TPGK

*grunch* Didn't ur mother ever tell u not to make it 16bb with AQ?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-06-2007, 01:16 PM
rakes.a.beach rakes.a.beach is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Abs. Poka @ UCLA
Posts: 1,043
Default Re: 100NL AQ turned TPGK

[ QUOTE ]
*grunch* Didn't ur mother ever tell u not to make it 16bb with AQ?

[/ QUOTE ]

nope. I make it 16 BB when 3-bet from blinds.


The real question on my hand is the turn play. C/F seems really weak. Leading push will only get better hands to call. so is Check/push the best line?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-06-2007, 03:05 PM
wrkingtobegreat wrkingtobegreat is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: changing
Posts: 1,008
Default Re: 100NL AQ turned TPGK

I didn't notice that you were in the BB, my apologies. Your raise is more justified. Check pushing is your best bet. If your calling a big river bet anyway it might bet some better two pair to fold. CHECK POOOSH.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:10 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.