Brian didn't respect PA till he lost 240k?

[Orlando Salazar]

"I am on my laptop so I don't' have any hand histories from yesterday. I ended up down about 240K to Patrik in our HU match. This was our fifth match and I had not been impressed with his play in the previous four. I felt that I really out played him, well this match was different. He played extremely well and I have to give him credit. He countered my strategy and overall game plan well. "

WTF? I don't think brian is great but I know he doesnt' suck. Did he ever wonder why he "outplayed" PA so much. Maybe its cause Brian ran hot and PA ran like crap, not cause he's "not impressive" I think Brian came off the same conceited way just before that 1 million dollar omaha downswing ('I'm top 5 in the world!'). I'm really jealous and hope brian suffers a huge losing streak, as that would make me feel better about myself. I find it hard to believe that one individual is vastly better than all other internet pros who have played longer. I know 2+2 loves brian AND THAT HE IS A SOLID PLAYER, but what are the odds he's soo much better than all the top NLHE players? Lets be real here. I understand TLK being that much better but he had a super high IQ and still lost to Patrick sometimes. Brian comes off as a total douche. I know you guys wont agree cause you have gay love for him. But this is my view.

[MarkD]

[ QUOTE ]
I understand TLK being that much better but he had a super high IQ and still lost to Patrick sometimes.

[/ QUOTE ]

I thought you were serious until I read this.

[Orlando Salazar]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I understand TLK being that much better but he had a super high IQ and still lost to Patrick sometimes.

[/ QUOTE ]

I thought you were serious until I read this.

[/ QUOTE ]

Explain please. TLK has like 160 IQ, are u saying brian is smarter?

[luckyjimm]

News just in: Sbrugby pwned by worst hand in poker:

Full Tilt Poker Game #2537358152: Table Pimento (heads up) - $200/$400 - No Limit Hold'em - 15:33:23 ET - 2007/05/29
Seat 1: sbrugby ($47,998.50)
Seat 2: perkyshmerky ($16,999)
sbrugby posts the small blind of $200
perkyshmerky posts the big blind of $400
The button is in seat #1
*** HOLE CARDS ***
sbrugby raises to $1,200
perkyshmerky calls $800
*** FLOP *** [6c 7c 5d]
perkyshmerky checks
sbrugby bets $1,800
perkyshmerky raises to $3,600
sbrugby calls $1,800
*** TURN *** [6c 7c 5d] [Jd]
perkyshmerky bets $12,199, and is all in
sbrugby calls $12,199
perkyshmerky shows [2s 7s]
sbrugby shows [Kh Js]
*** RIVER *** [6c 7c 5d Jd] [7h]
perkyshmerky shows three of a kind, Sevens
sbrugby shows two pair, Jacks and Sevens
perkyshmerky wins the pot ($33,997.50) with three of a kind, Sevens
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot $33,998 | Rake $0.50
Board: [6c 7c 5d Jd 7h]
Seat 1: sbrugby (small blind) showed [Kh Js] and lost with two pair, Jacks and Sevens
Seat 2: perkyshmerky (big blind) showed [2s 7s] and won ($33,997.50) with three of a kind, Sevens

[ReubWills]

No!

[ QUOTE ]
News just in: Sbrugby pwned by worst hand in poker:

Full Tilt Poker Game #2537358152: Table Pimento (heads up) - $200/$400 - No Limit Hold'em - 15:33:23 ET - 2007/05/29
Seat 1: sbrugby ($47,998.50)
Seat 2: perkyshmerky ($16,999)
sbrugby posts the small blind of $200
perkyshmerky posts the big blind of $400
The button is in seat #1
*** HOLE CARDS ***
sbrugby raises to $1,200
perkyshmerky calls $800
*** FLOP *** [6c 7c 5d]
perkyshmerky checks
sbrugby bets $1,800
perkyshmerky raises to $3,600
sbrugby calls $1,800
*** TURN *** [6c 7c 5d] [Jd]
perkyshmerky bets $12,199, and is all in
sbrugby calls $12,199
perkyshmerky shows [2s 7s]
sbrugby shows [Kh Js]
*** RIVER *** [6c 7c 5d Jd] [7h]
perkyshmerky shows three of a kind, Sevens
sbrugby shows two pair, Jacks and Sevens
perkyshmerky wins the pot ($33,997.50) with three of a kind, Sevens
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot $33,998 | Rake $0.50
Board: [6c 7c 5d Jd 7h]
Seat 1: sbrugby (small blind) showed [Kh Js] and lost with two pair, Jacks and Sevens
Seat 2: perkyshmerky (big blind) showed [2s 7s] and won ($33,997.50) with three of a kind, Sevens

[/ QUOTE ]

[JMa]

salazarrrrr, are you for real?

[Orlando Salazar]

in regards to what. I just don't think its possible for brian to have such a substantial edge on other top pros. it just doesn't make sense. does it make sense to you?

[MarkD]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I understand TLK being that much better but he had a super high IQ and still lost to Patrick sometimes.

[/ QUOTE ]

I thought you were serious until I read this.

[/ QUOTE ]

Explain please. TLK has like 160 IQ, are u saying brian is smarter?

[/ QUOTE ]

No. I don't know much about brian or TLK as I am not a fanboy of any of this stuff (but do enjoy reading the gossip about busto's) but your statement is plain stupid and as such it made the rest of your post come off as being a big level.

I guess, since you wrote it, it probably wasn't a level and was just stupid. I'm sorry for ever posting in a thread you started.

[Orlando Salazar]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I understand TLK being that much better but he had a super high IQ and still lost to Patrick sometimes.

[/ QUOTE ]

I thought you were serious until I read this.

[/ QUOTE ]

Explain please. TLK has like 160 IQ, are u saying brian is smarter?

[/ QUOTE ]

No. I don't know much about brian or TLK as I am not a fanboy of any of this stuff (but do enjoy reading the gossip about busto's) but your statement is plain stupid and as such it made the rest of your post come off as being a big level.

I guess, since you wrote it, it probably wasn't a level and was just stupid. I'm sorry for ever posting in a thread you started.

[/ QUOTE ]
Explain why the comment was stupid? Or are you too stupid to do that....
Mark: Stupid post salazar
Salazar: why?
Mark: Cause you're a stupid poster

Hmmm, very intelligent answer.

[nath]

I don't understand.

Brian thinks Patrik didn't play particularly well in their first four heads-up matches...

...and Orlando [censored] Salazar thinks it's because Brian doesn't understand how luck works or how to properly assess his edge?

"LOL"?