![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
So ur at a three tables wit a higher stakes reg that is literally pushing every hand. All three tables are 6 max and full. My question is as the game progresses and more of my br gets on the tables frm suckouts...setups...ect at what point should i stop playing at these tables due to the elevated risk of ruin assuming the bankroll i have is not easily replaceable. im looking for a percentage i guess. srry for length and punctuation (or lackthereof)
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
<20 BI's leave the table
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Umm if someones pushing everyhand, im probably not leaving unless things are looking pretty dire.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
Umm if someones pushing everyhand, im probably not leaving unless things are looking pretty dire. [/ QUOTE ] |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The ol' 20 buy-in rule is pretty standard, but if this guy is literally pushing every hand, that's too big of an edge to pass up. I'd be willing to stay with only a few buy-ins, I think.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
this totally depends on what you are comfortable risking.
If its not easily replaceable, I wouldnt want to wager more than 5%/bet (about 20 buyin bankroll). Some would go as high as 50% and some as low as 1% or 2%. This is the sort of question you need to ask yourself. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
There exists something called the Kelly criterion for determining how much of a finite bankroll to wager when you have a certain edge. Probably too mathematically-involved to be useful for a weird spot like this, but you can look it up if you're interested.
|
![]() |
|
|