Dare I say it

bigballz · #1 05-10-2007, 08:08 PM

I think the strat forum needs to be split

berate me

timex · #2 05-10-2007, 08:18 PM

I think it needs to be removed

Exitonly · #3 05-10-2007, 08:18 PM

i support this, atleast for a trial period.

Bond18 · #4 05-10-2007, 08:28 PM

Yea i've been thinking about this to. I support your motion.

Perhaps under 50 buy in and over?

Ansky · #5 05-10-2007, 08:36 PM

[ QUOTE ]
Yea i've been thinking about this to. I support your motion.

Perhaps under 50 buy in and over?

[/ QUOTE ]

50r+ 200fo+ IMO

Also, >500 for live.

Bond18 · #6 05-10-2007, 08:49 PM

What about the new stars 109 FO's with 3k start? What about stuper/fuper? Also UB's deep stacked FO's and bounty.

I think theres prolly not enough 200 FO's to not include the 100's/150's.

Clayton · #7 05-10-2007, 08:55 PM

what about RPS tournaments

bigballz · #8 05-10-2007, 08:56 PM

I was thinking $100 FO+, $55 for rebuys. obv it wouldn't be an even split quantity-wise, but the number of low limit posts is redic compared to the number of higher stakes posts. This sort of reminds me of the debate to split the STTf last year, except I think this is more needed. You have to weed through so much to find the higher stakes threads, more people will feel better posting hands, yada yada...

grafyx · #9 05-10-2007, 08:58 PM

[ QUOTE ]
What about the new stars 109 FO's with 3k start? What about stuper/fuper? Also UB's deep stacked FO's and bounty.

I think theres prolly not enough 200 FO's to not include the 100's/150's.

[/ QUOTE ]

Since you're the only one who posts hands at this level, we could call it the Bond forum.

Sherman · #10 05-10-2007, 09:15 PM

[ QUOTE ]
i support this, atleast for a trial period.

[/ QUOTE ]

I would also be against it as a player who is earnestly trying to build a BR to move up to higher stakes (while not playing professionally). Which is why I try to contribute to the high buy-in questions despite not playing them.

I suppose I would spend about equal time in both forums. However, I would feel that I had to spend an obligatory amount of time in the lower forum b/c I feel like I "owe" people advice there.

I would certainly learn a lot more myself in the higher buy-in forum. I don't know. It's bad enough I have to open two browsers to see MTTs and MTTc. [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]

View Poll Results: When considering hands for low purposes only (and with no qualifier on low) which is the better low
Player A with AA234	30	57.69%
Player B with KK234	22	42.31%
Voters: 52. You may not vote on this poll