![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks for giving some evidence for my claim that the continuation bet is over-used.
I know I should probably learn to do this myself, but have you done data on how continuation bets fare depending on position? For example, if a pot is vs two opponents, how does a c-bet's effectiveness vary depending on whether you are first, second, or last to act on the flop? I'm surprised that c-betting paired flops is more successful than unpaired flops, just because it seems that so many players won't fold ace-high or like to play back at me on paired flops. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
This is probably the best article in the history of the 2+2 magazine.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Great article and interesting research.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
This is probably the best article in the history of the 2+2 magazine. [/ QUOTE ] |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I assume that the bets for different flops are also for different amounts. For instance, the general wisdom is that a C-bet should be larger on a flop of 8s 9s Kd than a flop of Js Jd 4h. It would be interesting to see the data further broken down by amount on various flops, as well as position.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hey guys,
Thanks for the kind words. I'll see if I can look into a couple of your suggestions for things to look at. Tysen |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Am I missing something?
As I understood your article, it draws inferences about continuation bets by analyzing data drawn from all bets on the flop whether the bets are continuation bets or not. As I'm sure we all understand, continuation bets are a specific subset of flop bets with characteristics that at least arguably make them more likely to succeed in taking the pot that most other flop bets. So what's the basis for assuming the flop bet data says anything meaningful about continuation bets? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
One of the few stats that I use from Poker Office as an overlay is the continuation bet percentage. It's easy many times to make a decision when you see that someone makes a continuation bet 100% of the time. Very nice article.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I really liked this article. Great info, clearly presented, and an entertaining read to boot. Awesome job.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tyson,
great article, articulated well. can you tell us: what was the size of the data set? thx! |
![]() |
|
|