|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
$109 Limp, shove, call?
***** Hand History for Game 5916334353 *****
NL Texas Hold'em $109 USD Buy-in Trny: 33130185 Level: 6 Blinds(300/600) - Friday, April 27, 14:56:31 ET 2007 Table Speed #1337472 (Real Money) Seat 2 is the button Total number of players : 7 Seat 1: nigit ( 1,740 ) Seat 5: NUTZBOT ( 3,320 ) Seat 7: beeline25 ( 2,380 ) Seat 2: Pudge_714 ( 1,880 ) Seat 8: Making_Moves ( 4,520 ) Seat 3: eidos37 ( 2,560 ) Seat 10: NIK_55 ( 3,600 ) Trny: 33130185 Level: 6 Blinds(300/600) ** Dealing down cards ** Dealt to Pudge_714 [ Ad Tc ] beeline25 folds Making_Moves folds NIK_55 calls [600] nigit is all-In [1,740] Pudge_714? Limp is standard on party. Shove is also a widish range. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $109 Limp, shove, call?
I think it's a call. Unless one of them has an ace, you're not bad with both of them calling (if they do); even if one of them folds, you're not bad and see 66-99 a lot; if you're lucky, A9s or KQs. And if both call, you can see 99 and 77 a good chunk of the time, and you're happy with that.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $109 Limp, shove, call?
Grunch: Fold. You can't be ahead hear. Limper prolly has a weak pocket pair, shover prolly has a better ace, imo.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $109 Limp, shove, call?
id get it in here.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $109 Limp, shove, call?
[ QUOTE ]
id get it in here. [/ QUOTE ] |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $109 Limp, shove, call?
call seems good.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $109 Limp, shove, call?
What do you mean by widish range? If that is top 30+ I am prettty sure this is a call. If its top 20-25 its probably a fold.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $109 Limp, shove, call?
[ QUOTE ]
What do you mean by widish range? If that is top 30+ I am prettty sure this is a call. If its top 20-25 its probably a fold. [/ QUOTE ] I mean it isn't a nitty range. It's not like 88+ AT+. As for the actual range, I'm not sure. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $109 Limp, shove, call?
Your pretty far away from the money with 3bbs and a ton of dead money...id call
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $109 Limp, shove, call?
Looking at sngwiz I get:
If openlimper is on 40+ the pusher has to be on 30+ for this to be +EV. If openlimper is on 30+ the pusher has to be on 40+ for this to be +EV. If openlimper is on 25+ the pusher has to be on 60+ for this to be +EV. This does not account for overcalls from the blinds I believ so it should be even more -EV. looks like a fold if sngwiz is calculating this correctly. |
|
|