|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
New ICM tool for STTs
Stumbled across this free tool on another forum
http://www.pokersoftwaretools.com/ It does ICM analysis while you're playing. Tried it in a few lower-stakes turbo SnGs on PokerStars and it seemed to work well, anyone else having any experience with it? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: New ICM tool for STTs
the link and all the programs on that page are great and free, but i dont know, if its allowed to use an ICM-calculator with a HUD display on stars.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: New ICM tool for STTs
In my view, I don't see how it could forbidden if it only use the table stats.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: New ICM tool for STTs
has anyone had success w/ this program?
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: New ICM tool for STTs
pffft, only works for 2 tables on stars, I guess I'll try it out eventually.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: New ICM tool for STTs
This is fantastic- although I don't see me using it while I play unless I start doing just 3/4 at a time [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: New ICM tool for STTs
[ QUOTE ]
pffft, only works for 2 tables on stars, I guess I'll try it out eventually. [/ QUOTE ] I got it to work when I had 6 going, I just opened one sttanalyzer at a time right before a tourney started and waited till the first hand complete then clicked start timer. All 6 had players names/stacks correct |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: New ICM tool for STTs
real time ICM has to be considered unfair advantage software.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: New ICM tool for STTs
I would think so too Noodleman. I also wouldn't download any programs from a site that I had never heard of, posted by a user with 7 posts.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: New ICM tool for STTs
[ QUOTE ]
I would think so too Noodleman. I also wouldn't download any programs from a site that I had never heard of, posted by a user with 7 posts. [/ QUOTE ] Enable virus scanners, firewalls etc...Don't allow the program to connect to the internet for instance. I do not recommend you download unknown software if you're incapable of protecting yourself. I should have clarified that in the original post. |
|
|