|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
nl 100 top two v loose passive postflop
Party Poker - No Limit Hold'em Cash Game - $0.50/$1 Blinds - 6 Players - (LegoPoker HH Converter)
SB: $114.25 <u>Hero (BB): $121</u> <u>UTG: $132.65</u> MP: $89.50 CO: $20.15 BTN: $155 <font color="black">Preflop:</font> Hero is dealt A[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] Q[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (6 Players) <font color="red">UTG raises to $4</font>, 4 folds, Hero calls $3 <font color="black">Flop:</font> ($8.50) T[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 9[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] Q[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] (2 Players) Hero checks, <font color="red">UTG bets $6</font>, Hero calls $6 <font color="black">Turn:</font> ($20.50) 7[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (2 Players) Hero checks, UTG checks <font color="black">River:</font> ($20.50) A[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (2 Players) <font color="red">Hero bets $15</font>, <font color="red">UTG raises to $45</font> Villain is 44.68/35.46/1.85 over 141 hands. He has roughly the same aggression on every street. I made a note that he slowplayed trip 9's on a board with a flush draw. Is this river close? I am not sure whether he'd raise AT,A9 on this river. Note: I didn't want to raise my AQs oop against this player, although it would theoretically be correct against his high PFR, are most uf us still raising? folding (I don't see myself folding cause I feel my hand is well ahead of his range)? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: nl 100 top two v loose passive postflop
call to beat AJ
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: nl 100 top two v loose passive postflop
definitely 3bet PF
If you just call the flop then bet the turn as played you have to call river theres so many 2 pair hands you beat as well as AK/AJ that gave up the caught river and made a dodgy raise |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: nl 100 top two v loose passive postflop
@ dave
So you'd have raised and felted this flop if villain had called as far as I am understand your implications correctly? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: nl 100 top two v loose passive postflop
I would often 3bet to $13 and and bet like $22 on flop and take it from there
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: nl 100 top two v loose passive postflop
my main point was that after you smooth call the flop I don't see why you didn't love him checking the turn and immediately bet $14-17
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: nl 100 top two v loose passive postflop
Wow, 3 bet preflop, esp with his stats. Folding pre is not an option, although i would prolly 3-bet around 75-80% of time here. I just call on river cause its a WA/WB situation and after he shows A10 or A9 i curse myself for being so weak and not pushing cause I know he surely calls. Hmm...actually pushing isn't that bad of a play either cause he could be doing this with AK or A10 or A9, esp with his stats.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: nl 100 top two v loose passive postflop
[ QUOTE ]
Wow, 3 bet preflop, esp with his stats. Folding pre is not an option, although i would prolly 3-bet around 75-80% of time here. I just call on river cause its a WA/WB situation and after he shows A10 or A9 i curse myself for being so weak and not pushing cause I know he surely calls. Hmm...actually pushing isn't that bad of a play either cause he could be doing this with AK or A10 or A9, esp with his stats. [/ QUOTE ] I am not sure about a value shove. I contemplated value shoving, but I feel that villain is too passive postflop to justify a value shove. I think it's more a WA/WB spot as you said. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: nl 100 top two v loose passive postflop
Ok, so you don't like 3-betting pre. Why didn't you 3-bet on the flop?
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: nl 100 top two v loose passive postflop
Wow he can have lots of Axs here for 2p. He might be a retard s/playing a set but he can also have a LOT of hands you beat.
|
|
|